Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:03:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Duplicate of 184117
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Duplicates of 184117
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Duplicates of 184117
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 9 22:17:02 UTC 2003
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/debug4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/debug4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/debug4.C (test for exces
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 9 22:17:02 UTC 2003
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/debug4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/debug4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/debug4.C (test for excess
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 9 22:17:02 UTC 2003
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: InvokeReturn output from source compiled test
FAIL: InvokeReturn output from bytecode->native test
FAIL: InvokeReturn -O output from source co
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 9 22:17:02 UTC 2003
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.pt/repo3.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2003 15:48:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184120: Bug fixed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2003 15:48:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184120: Bug fixed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Hi, I believe this has already been fixed in 1:3.2.3-0pre5 ? Thanks.
T
--
Too many people seek freedom but are enslaved by their seeking.
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 17:47, Matthias Klose wrote:
> what, if you get libgc6-dev manually, then
>
> apt-get source gcc-3.3
On intel platform...
Installing the libgc6-dev package solves the basic build problem:
dpkg-deb: building package `gcc-3.3-base' in
`../gcc-3.3-base_3.3-0pre0_i386.d
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Randolph Chung
>Organization: Debian
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: [3.3 regression] inline optimization ICE
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: optimization
>Class: ice-on-legal-code
>Release: 3.3 20030309 (Debian
12 matches
Mail list logo
