Bug#179807: marked as done (maxima: [m68k] FTBFS with undefined references to libglc.a)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:02:52 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#179807: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds1-0pre2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Results for 3.3 20030222 (prerelease) testsuite on i386-pc-linux-gnu

/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3 20030222 (prerelease) === g77 tests === Running target unix === g77 Summary === # of expected passes1644 # of unsupported tests 8 /build/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20030221/build/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version

Results for 3.3 20030222 (prerelease) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20030221/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3 20030222 (prerelease) === g77 tests === Running target unix === g77 Summary === # of expected passes1644 # of unsupported tests 8 /home/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot

Bug#180218: marked as done (gcj-3.2 should provide javah alternative)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:02:53 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#180218: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds1-0pre2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#153965: marked as done ([PR preprocessor/8602] incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:02:52 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#153965: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds1-0pre2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#181813: marked as done (ICE patch from upstream)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:02:53 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#181813: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds1-0pre2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#179298: marked as done (gcj-3.2: provide "jar" command with gcj)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:02:52 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#179298: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds1-0pre2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds1-0pre2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-0pre2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-0pre2_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.3-0pre2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-0pre2_i386.deb fastjar_3.2.3-0pre2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.3-0pre2_i386.deb fixincludes_3.2.3-0pre2_i386.deb

Re: GNAT 3.15p

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > Nonetheless, I suspect that the package won't build on sparc, > since 5smastop.adb at least has disappeared in this version. > Sam ported GNAT to sparc/linux and powerpc/linux and I have no > idea about how he proceeded. > > Are you able to test? No, th

Re: GNAT 3.15p

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > >>> I'll check soon if I can get GNAT 3.15p to bootstrap on reasonably >>> current unstable... > >> Thanks for taking care of this. > > A preliminary 3.15p source package is now available at >

Re: GNAT 3.15p

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: >> I'll check soon if I can get GNAT 3.15p to bootstrap on reasonably >> current unstable... > Thanks for taking care of this. A preliminary 3.15p source package is now available at (beware, slow link). At least for

Bug#173457: marked as done (g77 cernlib doesnt link properly since a few days / resubmit with package name g77)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:29:33 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing report, no feedback has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

gcc-snapshot_20030221-1_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20030221-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030221-1_hppa.deb Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

gcc-snapshot_20030221-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20030221-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030221-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20030221-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030221-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20030221-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030221-1_i386.deb gcc-snapshot

Bug#179117: egcs1.1: FTBFS on sid

Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove the egcs1.1 source package from unstable. It doesn't build from source anymore, and it's not needed anymore. At least no non-free package references it. If libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 is needed it has to be fetched from woody or even potato. bugs 70286, 148385 and

Re: GNAT 3.15p

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Usually Florian keeps an open eye on gnat. AFAICR 3.14 passes an Ada >> validation suite, which 3.15 does not yet pass (please correct me if I >> am wrong). Therefore nobody packaged 3.15 yet. > > I believ

Re: woody gcc-2.95 test suite failures

Pigeon writes: > Hi, > > Using apt-get --compile source to build gcc-2.95 on my woody system, I > find that the test suite results give around 1560 "unexpected > failures" for gcc. > > Bad compilation? Don't think so. Running the testsuite on the > precompiled version in the woody .deb gives the

Bug#138038: Help offered with report #138038

Kalle Olavi Niemitalo writes: > Why didn't you use the snippet that I mailed to you? you didn't send it in time for the release. will be included in the next release. Matthias

Re: GNAT 3.15p

Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Usually Florian keeps an open eye on gnat. AFAICR 3.14 passes an Ada > validation suite, which 3.15 does not yet pass (please correct me if I > am wrong). Therefore nobody packaged 3.15 yet. I believe that it is reasonable (even desirable) to replace 3

Bug#179931: libstdc++5-dev: locales are broken

I am unable to reproduce this using g++-3.2 3.2.3-0pre1 and gcc-snapshot. Please could you recheck? Akim Demaille writes: > Package: libstdc++5-dev > Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre8 > Severity: normal > > The following program used to display the whole range of French > characters when LC_CTYPE was proper

Bug#178790: marked as done (gcc: internal error - cpp0 got fatal signal 11 - cc -O3 poll.c from perl5.8.0)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 12:23:38 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#178790: gcc sig11 - no longer reproduced, hardware problem? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#180315: marked as done (gij: apt-get remove gij leaves /usr/bin/java and /etc/alternatives/java)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 12:00:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#180315: gij: apt-get remove gij leaves /usr/bin/java and /etc/alternatives/java has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#180486: gcc-3.2: miscompilation on powerpc with -O2 or higher

Camm Maguire writes: > Package: gcc-3.2 > Version: 1:3.2.2-1 > Severity: normal > > When compiling GCL, the produced lisp image segfaults early on > iwhen using -O2 or higher. All is fine with -O, or with full > optimization using earlier gcc versions on this platform. - did GCL compile correctl

Bug#179807: Processed: Re: Bug#179807: maxima: [m68k] FTBFS with undefined references to libglc.a

that's due to the missing crtbeginT.o. This will be fixed with 3.2.3-0pre2. Debian Bug Tracking System writes: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > reassign 179807 gcc-3.2 > Bug#179807: maxima: [m68k] FTBFS with undefined references to libglc.a > Bug reassigned from package `maxima'