Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

Hi Gotom, I'm trying to explain how I understand these issues, but it might not be correct: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:49:44AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > 1. Why is __fixunsdfdi appeared, on the contrary why is not __fixdfdi > appeared gcc does the double -> signed long long conversion inli

Your favorite artists - Vos artistes favoris

Title: Artprice, the world leader in Art mArket InfOrmation Check your favorite Artists and the true price of their artworks on Artprice! Vous vous intéressez à un Artiste, vérifiez le vrai prix de ses œuvres sur Artprice ! Type last name (or first 3 letters m

Re: Processed: reassign 179781 to glibc, severity of 179781 is serious, merging 179781 178645

At Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:43:24 -0800, Ryan Murray wrote: > [1 ] > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:10:59AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:48:14 -0600, > > Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > > > reassign 179781 glibc > > > B

Processed: The 'fixed' severity is obsolete

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 20625 important Bug#20625: cvs-pcl: Compilation of elc files fails Bug#21068: error compiling Severity set to `important'. > tags 20625 + fixed Bug#20625: cvs-pcl: Compilation of elc files fails There were no tags set. Bug#21068: error compili