Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 175526 gcc-3.2
Bug#175526: [m68k] nearly all gcc-3.2 tests fail with glibc-2.3
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `gcc-3.2'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
reassign 175526 gcc-3.2
thanks
m68k gcc-3.2 is under building by me, and it's gcc bug, not glibc.
I reassign this bug from glibc to gcc-3.2.
-- gotom
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7368
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 88
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.mike/eh33.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/eh50.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/eh50.C Execution test
XPASS:
Hi,
to solve this problem, the new sources
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.2.2/adainclude/a-numaux.ads and
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.2.2/adainclude/a-numaux.adb should be
replaced by the following old version of a-numaux.ads:
-
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 3.2.2-0pre8
Severity: important
This is a regression from gcc-2.95 but is fixed by gcc-snapshot
(20030129-1). Compiling with -O1 makes the ICE go away. I've made the
-save-temps output available here:
http://people.debian.org/~troup/predicates.i.gz
(It's 190k uncompre
Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:17:57 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#179931: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds0-0pre1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:17:57 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#180520: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds0-0pre1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:17:57 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#180129: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds0-0pre1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Accepted:
cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-0pre1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-0pre1_all.deb
cpp-3.2_3.2.3-0pre1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-0pre1_i386.deb
fastjar_3.2.3-0pre1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.3-0pre1_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.2.3-0pre1_i386.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libstdc++5-dev_3.2.3-0pre1_i386.deb: package says priority is optional,
override says standard.
libgcc1_3.2.3-0pre1_i386.deb: package says priority is standard, override says
important.
gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds0-0pre1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libstdc++5-doc_3.2.3-0pre1_all.deb
libstdc++5-dev_3.2.3-0pre1_i386.deb
gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.3-0pre1_all.deb
gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds0-0pre1.diff.gz
gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-0pre1_i386.deb
gobjc-3.2_3.2.3-0pre1_i386
12 matches
Mail list logo