Title: Unbenanntes Dokument
Hallo Du, suchst Du einen Neuen Partner der dich liebevoll
verwöhnt und alles für Dich macht?
Dann bist Du bei uns richtig.
Wir sind der größte Kontaktmarkt im Internet.
Es sind ständig neu
Has anyone tried to build elfutils 0.72 from rawhide on debian
using our gcc-3.2? I thought I would try to build it since redhat
is using that instead of libelf from now on to link into their
prelink binary. I found that on debian ppc sid we get a build failure
(with libelf0-dev deinstalled to p
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:25:04 +0100
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is it likely this will be addressed in the gcc-3.2 branch?
Are you volunteering?
-benjamin
med.
Here's a shorter testcase that crashes 3.2-branch, 3.3-branch and mainline
(as of 20030113) :(
--snip here--
SUBROUTINE FOO (B)
10 CALL BAR(A)
ASSIGN 20 TO M
IF(100.LT.A) GOTO 10
GOTO
Rejected: a changes file with the same name already exists in the Done
directory.
Rejected: libobjc1_3.2.2-0pre5_hppa.deb: old version (1:3.2.2-0pre5) in
unstable >= new version (1:3.2.2-0pre5) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: can not overwrite existing copy of 'libobjc1_3.2.2-0pre5_hppa.deb'
al
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 5 14:12:19 UTC 2003
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bi
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 5 14:12:19 UTC 2003
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/opt/longbranch1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C (test for warnings, line 5)
XPASS: g++.law/profile1.C (test fo
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 5 14:12:19 UTC 2003
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfiel
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 5 14:12:19 UTC 2003
Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C (test for warnings, line 5)
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 5 14:12:19 UTC 2003
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jan 11 00:37:26 UTC 2003
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: 22_locale/codecvt_members_char_char.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/codecvt_members_wchar_t_char.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/ctor
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jan 9 20:28:35 UTC 2003
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/filter1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/filter2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/loop1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-poi
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jan 11 00:37:26 UTC 2003
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: PR1343 compilation from bytecode
FAIL: PR1343 -O compilation from bytecode
FAIL: calls run
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: cxxtest run
FAI
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jan 11 00:37:26 UTC 2003
Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C (test for warnings, line 5)
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jan 11 00:37:26 UTC 2003
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bi
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jan 11 00:37:26 UTC 2003
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jan 11 00:37:26 UTC 2003
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfiel
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:21:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#176533: gcc-3.0 not buildable, wrong build-dep
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-13
Severity: normal
gcc 3.0 is not buildable, because it depends on libc6.1-dev, which does
not exist in the archive - it should depend on libc6-dev, or am i wrong?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux slipstrea
On Monday 13 January 2003 10:44, Christoph Martin wrote:
> David Goodenough schrieb:
> > On Tuesday 05 November 2002 14:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >>On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:17:40PM +, David Goodenough wrote:
> >>>On Tuesday 05 November 2002 13:04, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Am Die, 20
David Goodenough schrieb:
> On Tuesday 05 November 2002 14:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:17:40PM +, David Goodenough wrote:
>>
>>>On Tuesday 05 November 2002 13:04, Christoph Martin wrote:
>>>
Am Die, 2002-11-05 um 01.34 schrieb GOTO Masanori:
>At M
22 matches
Mail list logo