Re: 3.2 transition

2002-12-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 08:56:43PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > On the FAQ: > > Why don't we put the libs in a different directory? > > Basically, it's too complex. For the glibc transition, we could do > this because they used different dynamic linkers. For this > transition, there is also

Re: 3.2 transition

2002-12-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 09:30:32AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:59:34PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:16:41PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > > * Daniel Jacobowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > >

Re: [eng@eipm.ch: mklibs doesn't manage to include symbol atexit]

2002-12-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:53:06AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello glibc/gcc maintainers, > > I have a problem with generating a reduced libc6 using the PIC version. > I don't know if the problem comes from libc6, from gcc or from myself. > I asked on debian-boot but nobody answered since th

Re: 3.2 transition

2002-12-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On the FAQ: Why don't we put the libs in a different directory? Basically, it's too complex. For the glibc transition, we could do this because they used different dynamic linkers. For this transition, there is also little to gain in having full backwards compatibility to the old ABI. The only

Bug#173290: gcj package does not provide gcj-wrapper-3.0

2002-12-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: gcj-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.4-13 Severity: grave /usr/bin/gcj-wrapper-3.0 is missing from gcj-3.0, which update-alternative points to. Packages which build-depend on gcj will pull in gcj-3.0, which is broken, which breaks build. regards, junichi

[eng@eipm.ch: mklibs doesn't manage to include symbol atexit]

2002-12-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello glibc/gcc maintainers, I have a problem with generating a reduced libc6 using the PIC version. I don't know if the problem comes from libc6, from gcc or from myself. I asked on debian-boot but nobody answered since the problem doesn't appear to come from mklibs bur rather glibc and/or gcc.

Re: 3.2 transition

2002-12-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:59:34PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:16:41PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > * Daniel Jacobowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Reference: http://people.debian.org/~rmurray/c++transition.html, which >