Re: 3.2 transition

2002-12-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:59:34PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:16:41PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > * Daniel Jacobowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Reference: http://people.debian.org/~rmurray/c++transition.html, which > > > seems > > > to be the latest

Re: 3.2 transition

2002-12-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:16:41PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Daniel Jacobowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Reference: http://people.debian.org/~rmurray/c++transition.html, which seems > > to be the latest copy. > > > > My understanding is that GCC 3.2 now works on all architectur

Re: 3.2 transition

2002-12-15 Thread Haroldo Gambini Santos
I have used gcc 3.2 for some time, in a Mandrake 9.0 Linux box. The speed improvement is amazing, however, I had a problem with gdb, that does not works will with this gcc version. In fact, you can't print local variables, for example. So, I'm very happy with Debian and the gcc 2.95 version by no

Re: 3.2 transition

2002-12-15 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Daniel Jacobowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Reference: http://people.debian.org/~rmurray/c++transition.html, which seems > to be the latest copy. > > My understanding is that GCC 3.2 now works on all architectures. That means > we're now past the last big blocker waiting for the transition.

3.2 transition

2002-12-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Reference: http://people.debian.org/~rmurray/c++transition.html, which seems to be the latest copy. My understanding is that GCC 3.2 now works on all architectures. That means we're now past the last big blocker waiting for the transition. Does anyone know of anything else holding us up, besides