What is next to be done before the transition can actually start. Is it
close enough at hand that it would be wise for me to put off uploading
KDE 3.1 for a few days? I don't want to wait months... ;)
Thanks,
Chris
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:46:36PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:44:30PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Has this bug been fixed yet? (I assume it has not)
>
> I am planning to upload kde 3.1 very soon (most likely this weekend)
> so I guess it will have to be with gcc 2.95 :(
The next gcc-3.2 upload will be fixed, yes.
--
Debian
Has this bug been fixed yet? (I assume it has not)
I am planning to upload kde 3.1 very soon (most likely this weekend)
so I guess it will have to be with gcc 2.95 :(
Chris Cheney
Your message dated Wed, 11 Dec 2002 02:47:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#171748: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds1-0pre1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Accepted:
cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre1_all.deb
cpp-3.2_3.2.2-0pre1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.2-0pre1_i386.deb
fastjar_3.2.2-0pre1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.2-0pre1_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.2.2-0pre1_i386.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libg2c0_3.2.2-0pre1_i386.deb: section is overridden from libs to devel.
fixincludes_3.2.2-0pre1_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra.
Either the package or the override
6 matches
Mail list logo