Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #171203
Sorry, my email address wasn't correct. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead.
--
Patrik Hägglund
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
Here is what happens if tetex-bin isn't installed during build
(apt-src build gcc-3.2):
TEXINPUTS=../../src/gcc/p/doc:../../src/gcc/p/doc/images:$TEXINPUTS \
MAKEINFO="LANG=en_GB LC_ALL=en_GB makeinf
Your message dated 29 Nov 2002 14:41:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#171123: g++-3.2: incorrect use of default assignment
operator?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Hmm, okay, my bad. I'm reading through 12.8 now and it seems the
implicit copy constructor is always available, not just when no other
constructors are defined as I had thought.
If you agree with this then please go ahead and close this bug.
Thanks - Ben.
> > I would have expected a compile error, since the declaration
> > "Foo bar = foo;" tries to use the non-existant default constructor for
> > class Foo.
>
> No, it doesn't. This is not a initialization followed by an assignment
> operator; there is no assignment operator at all in this statement
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would have expected a compile error, since the declaration
> "Foo bar = foo;" tries to use the non-existant default constructor for
> class Foo.
No, it doesn't. This is not a initialization followed by an assignment
operator; there is no assignment opera
Phil Edwards writes:
> After setting LD_LIBRARY_PATHY to /usr/lib/debug, and firing up the
> debugger, I can see that the correct libstdc++.so is being found (i.e.,
> the one with the debugging symbols). And stepping into those functions
> works, in that it knows the file/line location.
>
> Howev
7 matches
Mail list logo
