Whats wrong with my GCC compiler ?

apperantly i cant make executables with my GCC thats installed... and why is that i never had sutch a problem before... here is a output when i tyed to compile an simple eggdrop:   checking for gcc... gccchecking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot create exe

Re: Bug#169101: cluttered .diff.gz

On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 03:42:06PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin v. Loewis) writes: > > > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> But using GraphViz, even in this way, is not consistent with FSF > >> policies--so it would be rather easy to force you to change

nonstandard overloads in num_get facet

These additional overloads where added to libstdc++ in anticipation of a resolution to defect report 118, see http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#118 However, this defect report is resolved in a different way now (by removing extractor functions, instead of adding get meth

Bug#144935: marked as done (FTBFS: octave2.1 segfaults)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2002 08:57:49 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line #144935: please recheck with gcc-3.2 and/or gcc-snapshot has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#169101: cluttered .diff.gz

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin v. Loewis) writes: > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> But using GraphViz, even in this way, is not consistent with FSF >> policies--so it would be rather easy to force you to change it, >> theoretically speaking. > > Can you explain which FSF policy this is

Bad syntax error on nested classes' member functions.

This is not a bug in the compiler, but in your code. Looking at the declaration foo_t a::b::frobnicate() { I notice that the scope of a::b is only reentered at the opening ( of the method declaration, thus "foo_t" is *not* found to be the typedef. Instead, it is treated as a plain identifier (o

Bug#169101: cluttered .diff.gz

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But using GraphViz, even in this way, is not consistent with FSF > policies--so it would be rather easy to force you to change it, > theoretically speaking. Can you explain which FSF policy this is inconsistent with? This sounds like saying that you ca

Bug#161995: marked as done (gpc segfaults on in constructions)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:34:18 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161995: gpc segfaults on in constructions has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#144409: marked as done (g++-3.0: does not support transform(begin,end,begin,tolower) idiom)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:50:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#144409: g++-3.0: does not support transform(begin,end,be has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#141015: c/8609: Superfluous warning when -std=c99/gnu99 and noreturn on main()

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `c/8609'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: c >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: Superfluous warning when -std=c99/gnu99 and noreturn on main() >Arrival-Date:

Bug#149561: marked as done (bad pathnames coded into the libs)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:52:00 +0100 (MET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line really close #149561 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #141015 to gcc-gnats as PR c/8609

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 141015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#141015: gcc-3.0: Superfluous warning when -std=c99/gnu99 and noreturn on main() Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 141015 [PR c/8609] Superfluous warning when -std=c99

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #165635 to gcc-gnats as PR java/8608

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 165635 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#165635: gcj-3.0 : segmentation fault on compiling bad program Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 165635 [PR java/8608] segmentation fault on compiling bad program Bug#1

Processed: status of #135967 with gcc-3.2.1 ?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 135967 [fixed in g++-3.[12] ] unstable/arm: internal compile error > during compiling lapack Bug#135967: unstable/arm: internal compile error during compiling lapack Changed Bug title. > severity 135967 + fixed Unknown command or malformed arg

Bug#169024: marked as done (libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 after apt-get upgrade today from unstable included incorrect symlink?)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:34:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#165635: java/8608: segmentation fault on compiling bad program

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `java/8608'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: java >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: segmentation fault on compiling bad program >Arrival-Date: Sat Nov 16 04

Processed: retitle gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 140606 [fixed in gcc-3.2.1] ICE in incomplete_type_error Bug#140606: gcc-3.0: ICE in incomplete_type_error Changed Bug title. > tags 140606 + fixed Bug#140606: [fixed in gcc-3.2.1] ICE in incomplete_type_error Tags added: fixed > thanks Stoppi

Processed: Bug fixed in gij-3.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 146634 [fixed in gij-wrapper-3.2] gij-wrapper-3.0 should understand > -classpath parameter Bug#146634: gij-3.0: gij-wrapper-3.0 should understand -classpath parameter Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Superfluous warning when -std=c99/gnu99 and noreturn on main()

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Agthorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: c >Class: sw-bug >Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable) >Environment: System: De

Processed: retitle gij-3.0 report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 165180 [fixed in gij-3.2] missing libgcc1 dependency Bug#165180: gij-3.0 does not depend on libgcc1 (libgcc_s.so.1) which is required for its operation. Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

segmentation fault on compiling bad program

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:rOBie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: java >Class: ice-on-illegal-code >Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable) >Environme

Bug#166143: pending/8601: strlen/template interaction causes ICE

Synopsis: strlen/template interaction causes ICE State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 16 03:53:31 2002 State-Changed-Why: PR8332 is now updated with additional information. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&data

Bug#153965: c/8602: incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions

Synopsis: incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: neil State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 16 03:23:59 2002 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. Change category to C as it clearly has nothing to do with preprocessor. ht

Re: c++/8592: ICE in merge_blocks_move_predecessor_nojumps, at cfgcleanup.c:650

Synopsis: ICE in merge_blocks_move_predecessor_nojumps, at cfgcleanup.c:650 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: sirl State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 16 03:33:32 2002 State-Changed-Why: see . Current gcc-3_2-branch in

Bug#166255: ada/8606: GNAT floating point optimization bug

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `ada/8606'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: ada >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: GNAT floating point optimization bug >Arrival-Date: Sat Nov 16 02:56:02 PS

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #166255 to gcc-gnats as PR ada/8606

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 166255 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#166255: GNAT floating point optimization bug Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 166255 [PR ada/8606] GNAT floating point optimization bug Bug#166255: GNAT floating poin

GNAT floating point optimization bug

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kenneth Almquist) >Organization: The Debian Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ada >Class: wrong-code >Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable) >Environm

Bug#156662: marked as done (gcc 3.2 will need Depends and Build-Depends on binutils and glibc versions for ppc)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2002 11:22:54 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line build-dependencies fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #153965 to gcc-gnats as PR preprocessor/8602

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 153965 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#153965: gcc-3.1: incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 153965 [PR preprocessor/8602] incorrect line

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #161432 to gcc-gnats as PR target/8603

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 161432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#161432: Alpha: s?addl pattern doesn't work Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 161432 [PR target/8603] Alpha: s?addl pattern doesn't work Bug#161432: Alpha: s?addl patte

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #166143 to gcc-gnats as PR 8601

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 166143 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#166143: g++-3.2: strlen/template interaction causes ICE Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 166143 [PR 8601] strlen/template interaction causes ICE Bug#166143: g++-3.2:

Bug#153965: preprocessor/8602: incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `preprocessor/8602'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: preprocessor >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inli

I await your immediate reply

Fax No:234-1-7597602 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greetings, I crave your indulgence as I contact you in such a surprising manner. But I respectfully insist you read this letter carefully as I am optimistic it will open doors for unimaginable financial reward for both of us. This business transactio

Bug#161432: target/8603: Alpha: s?addl pattern doesn't work

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `target/8603'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: target >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: Alpha: s?addl pattern doesn't work >Arrival-Date: Sat Nov 16 02:16:0

Bug#169101: cluttered .diff.gz

Phil Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's upstream's position on using GraphViz: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-02/msg00946.html > > Find me a libre tool that produces output as nice as dot's, and that > Doxygen knows how to work with, and I'll use it. > > Yours truly, > Upstream

Alpha: s?addl pattern doesn't work

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:"Falk Hueffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: target >Class: pessimizes-code >Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable) >E

incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Category: preprocessor >Class: sw-bug >Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable) >Enviro

Bug#160894: g++-3.2: infinite loop in stl_tree.h

tags 160894 + moreinfo thanks please provide enough information to reproduce the behaviour. Olivier Leclant writes: > Package: g++-3.2 > Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre1 > Severity: normal > > I use a std::set in my code, and sometimes the program goes into an > infinite loop. The loop is at /usr/include

Bug#166940: target/8600: internal error using builtin shift MMX functions

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `target/8600'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: target >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: internal error using builtin shift MMX functions >Arrival-Date: Sat

Bug#169101: cluttered .diff.gz

Phil Edwards writes: > > > the big diff is the pregenerated libstdc++ documentation. > > I thought the library documentation was only in libstdc++?-doc, not the > gcc package. yes, but the libstdc++?-doc is built from the gcc-3.2 source package. and a build dependency of a source package in main

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #166940 to gcc-gnats as PR target/8600

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 166940 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#166940: gcc-3.2: internal error using builtin shift MMX functions Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 166940 [PR target/8600] internal error using builtin shift MMX > f

Processed: Re: Bug#160894: g++-3.2: infinite loop in stl_tree.h

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 160894 + moreinfo Bug#160894: g++-3.2: infinite loop in stl_tree.h Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

strlen/template interaction causes ICE

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Martin Dorey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Category: g++ >Class: ice-on-legal-code >Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable) >Environ

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #162919 to gcc-gnats as PR optimization/8599

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 162919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#162919: gcc-3.2: loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 162919 [PR optimization/8599] loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3 Bug#162919: gcc-3.2:

internal error using builtin shift MMX functions

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Petr Konecny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: target >Class: ice-on-legal-code >Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable) >En

Bug#163239: marked as done (Dependency problem with libstdc++5-dev on hurd-i386)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2002 09:39:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#163239: Dependency problem with libstdc++5-dev on hurd-i386 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#162919: optimization/8599: loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `optimization/8599'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: optimization >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3 >Arrival-Date: Sat Nov

Bug#168134: marked as done (g++-3.2: cc1plus failure while building Mozilla)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2002 09:30:06 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#168134: g++-3.2: cc1plus failure while building Mozilla has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Organization: The Debian Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Category: optimization >Class: wrong-code >Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable) >Environment: System:

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #168310 to gcc-gnats as PR c++/8598

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 168310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#168310: gcc-3.2: xmmintrin.h broken for c++ Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 168310 [PR c++/8598] xmmintrin.h broken for c++ Bug#168310: gcc-3.2: xmmintrin.h broken f

Bug#165829: GCC 3.2 C++ error on virtual function which uses ...

retitle 165829 [fixed in gcc-3.3] C++ error on virtual function which uses ... thanks you find a recent snapshot of the HEAD branch in the gcc-snapshot package. Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:51:03PM -0400, Reed Hedges wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash

Processed: Re: Bug#165829: GCC 3.2 C++ error on virtual function which uses ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 165829 [fixed in gcc-3.3] C++ error on virtual function which uses ... Bug#165829: GCC 3.2 C++ error on virtual function which uses ... Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#168310: c++/8598: xmmintrin.h broken for c++

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `c++/8598'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: c++ >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: xmmintrin.h broken for c++ >Arrival-Date: Sat Nov 16 00:26:04 PST 2002

xmmintrin.h broken for c++

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Matthias Klose >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Category: c++ >Class: sw-bug >Release: 3.2.1 2002 (Debian prerelease) (Debian testing/unstable) >Environment: System: