On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 15:26, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > (new) libg++2.8.1.3-glibc2.3_2.95.4-13_i386.deb optional libs
> > (new) libstdc++2.10-glibc2.3_2.95.4-13_i386.deb required base
> didn't see these when uploading. Do we really need new packages?
I don't know enough about these to really know
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:37:03AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I've tried to upgrade just the gcc part of my woody system to gcc-3.2 and
> > run into two problems related to the Build-Depends:
> >
> > - automake-1.4 is assumed instead of automake. Replace automake with
> > automake
> > (>=
Cher ami,
Ce courriel va changer votre existence. Vous allez être en mesure d'augmenter
considérablement vos ventes pour la période des fêtes. Nous vous offrons une
solution de marketing direct qui vous permet de rejoindre plus de 200 000
consommateurs québécois !
Cette solution c'est la publici
Package: gij-3.2
Severity: wishlist
Hi. There is currently a discussion on debian-java@lists.debian.org to
tighten debian java policy regarding JNI libraries.
Specifically, the proposal is that all JNI libraries should be installed
in /usr/lib/jni, and that /usr/lib/jni should be included in the
Debian Installer writes:
> (new) libg++2.8.1.3-glibc2.3_2.95.4-13_i386.deb optional libs
> (new) libstdc++2.10-glibc2.3_2.95.4-13_i386.deb required base
didn't see these when uploading. Do we really need new packages?
chill-2.95_2.95.4-13_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-13_i386.deb
cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-13_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-13_all.deb
cpp-2.95_2.95.4-13_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-13_i386.deb
g++-2.95_2.95.4-13_i386.deb
to pool/main/
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 04:14:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2002, Oliver M. Bolzer wrote:
> > Nevertheless, it IS a real problem. As the cmov instruction is OPTIONAL
> > for i686 but GCC uses it for 686, that is the cause of the problem. That
> > the kernel compile
Rejected: md5sum for gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds14-13.diff.gz in incoming doesn't match
gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds14-13.dsc.
Rejected: size for gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds14-13.diff.gz in incoming doesn't match
gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds14-13.dsc.
Rejected: gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-13_i386.deb: md5sum check failed.
Rejected: gobjc-2.95
On Tue, 05 Nov 2002, Oliver M. Bolzer wrote:
> Nevertheless, it IS a real problem. As the cmov instruction is OPTIONAL
> for i686 but GCC uses it for 686, that is the cause of the problem. That
> the kernel compiles itself as 585 if a C3 is specified is simply a
> work-around. The correct solution
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:47:55PM +0100, Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote...
> "Oliver M. Bolzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The problem with OpenSSL is, that it is hand-assembly. The author is using
> > the cmov instruction for an i686-optimized routine, though that instruction
"Oliver M. Bolzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 09:23:16AM +, Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
> > On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 12:13:07PM +0100, Michael Karcher wrote:
> > > take profit of these instructions, but It seems likely. Is there any
Hi gcc-maintainer,
do you know anything about a fix, so that gcc does not cmov code with
the -mcpu=i686 option?
Christoph
--- Begin Message ---
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 13:04, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Am Die, 2002-11-05 um 01.34 schrieb GOTO Masanori:
> > At Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:07:56 +0100,
>
Fruhwirth Clemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - gnat-3.2 is required by gcc to build. It looks like gcc build
> correctly with gnat-3.14p-3 of woody, so this could be probably
> relaxed to 'gnat (>=3.14p-3) | gnat-3.2'
I think this change is reasonable.
After all, all bets are off with GNAT 5.
13 matches
Mail list logo
