camera series(color, B/W, low)

Shenzhen Surway technologies co., ltd have engaged in CCTV products for several years, Which locate in the beautiful city of SHENZHEN in China. Our products include ¨ Surway digital video recorder system ¨ Surway DVR card series ¨ Surway camera series(color, B/W, low) ¨

Re: c/7873: arm-linux-gcc fails when assigning address to a bit field

python2.3 now builds fine on arm-linux with this patch. It's not yet checked into the 3.2 branch. Richard Earnshaw writes: > > > >How-To-Repeat: > > > > /** Run "arm-linux-gcc -c" on this preprocessed segment : **/ > > > > > > unsigned int x0 = 0; > > > > typedef struct { > > unsigned int

Bug#162201: NetBSD/i386 uses GCC 3.2

Package: gcc-defaults Version: n/a Severity: wishlist Much like the Hurd, the NetBSD/i386 port does not require a smooth transition and is currently using GCC 3.2; we would appreciate it if you would add a suitable section to gcc-defaults to reflect this (archname netbsd-i386, per not-yet-released

Bug#161517: marked as done (-classpath /path/to/some.jar eaten by wrapper script)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:23:52 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161517: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.1ds2-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#161438: marked as done (gcc-3.2 needs automake-1.4 Build-Depends)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:23:52 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161438: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.1ds2-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#160859: marked as done (gcj-3.2: Wrapper will not compile some files)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:23:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#160859: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.1ds2-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#159395: marked as done (FTBFS with MAKEFLAGS="-j2")

Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:23:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#159395: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.1ds2-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds2-0pre3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre3_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre3_i386.deb fastjar_3.2.1-0pre3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.1-0pre3_i386.deb fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre3_i386.deb

gcc-3.2 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libg2c0_3.2.1-0pre3_i386.deb: section is overridden from libs to devel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong pl

gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds14-12_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: chill-2.95_2.95.4-12_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-12_i386.deb cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-12_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-12_all.deb cpp-2.95_2.95.4-12_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-12_i386.deb g++-2.95_2.95.4-12_i386.deb to