Bug#159395: FTBFS with MAKEFLAGS="-j2"

2002-09-02 Thread Joel Baker
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 Severity: normal Trying to build GCC 3.2 (using GCC 3.0.4 experimental) on the NetBSD/i386 port with MAKEFLAGS="-j2" set (the -d flag is used to cope with the fact that it is a new port and some things are still in progress; the package builds fine if the

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-02 Thread Joel Baker
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:08:07PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:35:11PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:23:40PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > > > > We have to consider __dso_handle and __cxa_atexit separately. For > > > __dso_handle, can

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-02 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:35:11PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:23:40PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > /tmp/Build/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2ds0/build/i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so: > > > > un

Bug#159354: gcc-3.2_1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1(unstable/arm): FTBFS: arm patch uses invalid arg to autoconf

2002-09-02 Thread James Troup
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > James Troup writes: > > Package: gcc-3.2 > > Version: 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: evil doko made python2.2-dev depend on g++-3.2 :-P > > who to ask to change my login? maybe 'devil' ;-) > > Phil, the buildd lists a succes

Bug#159354: gcc-3.2_1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1(unstable/arm): FTBFS: arm patch uses invalid arg to autoconf

2002-09-02 Thread Matthias Klose
James Troup writes: > Package: gcc-3.2 > Version: 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 > Severity: serious > Justification: evil doko made python2.2-dev depend on g++-3.2 :-P who to ask to change my login? maybe 'devil' ;-) Phil, the buildd lists a successful build. why no upload? Matthias

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-02 Thread Joel Baker
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:23:40PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > /tmp/Build/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2ds0/build/i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so: > > > undefined reference to `__dso_handle' > > > /tmp/Build/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-3

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-02 Thread Martin v. Loewis
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > /tmp/Build/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2ds0/build/i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so: > > undefined reference to `__dso_handle' > > /tmp/Build/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2ds0/build/i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so:

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-02 Thread Joel Baker
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:06:51AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:10:08AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:18:01AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > # of expected passes5176 > > > > #

Bug#159354: gcc-3.2_1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1(unstable/arm): FTBFS: arm patch uses invalid arg to autoconf

2002-09-02 Thread James Troup
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 Severity: serious Justification: evil doko made python2.2-dev depend on g++-3.2 :-P -L doesn't seem to be a valid option for either autoconf or the wrapper... This is especially a problem because python2.2-dev now deps on g++-3.2 and the lack of it on ar

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-02 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:06:51AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:10:08AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:18:01AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > # of expected passes5176 > > > > #

Bug#158459: gcc-3.2: FTBFS as non-root

2002-09-02 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
> try > > dpkg-buildpackage "-rfakeroot --" ... It would probably work. Unfortunately, I used dpkg-buildpackage only because my first build attempt failed. I generally use: fakeroot apt-get -b source gcc-3.2 which would have the same problem with LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Therefore I think th

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-02 Thread Joel Baker
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:10:08AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:18:01AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > # of expected passes5176 > > > # of unexpected failures1114 > > > # of expected failures

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-02 Thread Joel Baker
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:18:01AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > # of expected passes5176 > > # of unexpected failures1114 > > # of expected failures 977 > > # of untested testcases 15 > > # of unsupported tests

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-02 Thread Martin v. Loewis
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > # of expected passes5176 > # of unexpected failures1114 > # of expected failures 977 > # of untested testcases 15 > # of unsupported tests 3 Those you should look at, first. gcc creates a detailed log file of a