Norbert Kiesel writes:
> Subject: libstdc++4-dev: header files moved
> Package: libstdc++4-dev
> Version: 1:3.1.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hi,
>
> header files moved from /us/include/g++-v3-3.1 to /usr/include/c++/-3.1
should be c++/3.1, not c++/-3.1. this is a mistake (gcc-3.3 uses this
sche
Subject: libstdc++4-dev: header files moved
Package: libstdc++4-dev
Version: 1:3.1.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
header files moved from /us/include/g++-v3-3.1 to /usr/include/c++/-3.1
Was this really intended (breaks my self-build stlport library)?
--nk
-- System Information
Debian Release: test
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 105309 [fixed in 3.3/HEAD: PR optimization/3995] i386 optimisation:
> joining tests
Bug#105309: [fixed in 3.2/HEAD: PR optimization/3995] i386 optimisation:
joining tests
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 95318 [fixed on 3.3/HEAD: PR optimization/2962] unnecessary cwtl
Bug#95318: [fixed on 3.2/HEAD: PR optimization/2962] unnecessary cwtl
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 105309: [fixed in 3.3/HEAD: PR optimization/3995] i386 optimisation:
> joining
YAEGASHI Takeshi writes:
> Package: gcc-defaults
> Version: 1.0
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm one of the porters of Debian/sh.
>
> GCC supports Linux/SH in 3.0 or later, and only gcc, g++ and gobjc
> packages are currently available. Could you please apply following
> patch
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:35:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#149776: fixed in gcc-3.1 1:3.1.1ds3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:35:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#152198: fixed in gcc-3.1 1:3.1.1ds3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:35:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148890: fixed in gcc-3.1 1:3.1.1ds3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:32:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#153261: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds13-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:35:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#147249: fixed in gcc-3.1 1:3.1.1ds3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'm one of the porters of Debian/sh.
GCC supports Linux/SH in 3.0 or later, and only gcc, g++ and gobjc
packages are currently available. Could you please apply following
patch to gcc-defaults' debian/rules?
diff -ruN gcc-d
Accepted:
cpp-3.1-doc_3.1.1-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.1/cpp-3.1-doc_3.1.1-1_all.deb
cpp-3.1_3.1.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.1/cpp-3.1_3.1.1-1_i386.deb
fastjar_3.1.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.1/fastjar_3.1.1-1_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.1.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.1/fix
Accepted:
cpp-3.1_3.1.1-1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.1/cpp-3.1_3.1.1-1_hppa.deb
fastjar_3.1.1-1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.1/fastjar_3.1.1-1_hppa.deb
fixincludes_3.1.1-1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.1/fixincludes_3.1.1-1_hppa.deb
g++-3.1_3.1.1-1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.1/g++-3
Accepted:
chill-2.95_2.95.4-11_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-11_i386.deb
cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-11_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-11_all.deb
cpp-2.95_2.95.4-11_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-11_i386.deb
g++-2.95_2.95.4-11_i386.deb
to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 153472 [PR c/4106] i386 -fPIC asm ebx clobber no error
Bug#153472: G++ 3.1.1 incorrectly handles clobbered registers in "asm volatile
()"
Changed Bug title.
> forwarded 153472 GCC-GNATS
Bug#153472: [PR c/4106] i386 -fPIC asm ebx clobber no err
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 154525 gcc
Bug#154525: g++-3.0: c++ symlink and alternatives are not created when
installing
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.0' to `gcc'.
> severity 154525 wishlist
Bug#154525: g++-3.0: c++ symlink and alternatives are not created when
in
reassign 154525 gcc
severity 154525 wishlist
merge 154525 112887
thanks
gcc-3.0/g++-3.0 doesn't use alternatives to make sure that the
preferred system compiler is used when calling 'gcc'. If you want to
test gcc-3.0/g++-3.0 for a particular package,
- use CC=gcc-3.0 CXX=g++-3.0 when configuring/
Brendan O'Dea writes:
> I can double-check myself when I have a chance, but I guess that you can
> probably close this report, or at least tag it in some way to identify
> that it's 2.95-specific.
ok.
> WHat is the status of 3.1 WRT building packages? Should or shouldn't we
> be using it yet?
I
>> I think, libs compiled with gcc 2.95 just should reside in separate
>> directory, say, /usr/lib/gcc-2.95-compat. Gcc 3.2.x should be run as
>> gcc or gcc-3.2. Gcc 2.95.x should be run as gcc-2.95.
>
>That will work; the question then is how to automatically create all
>those packages - you'ld n
19 matches
Mail list logo
