Re: Coexistence of gcc 3.2 and gcc 2.95

Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I think the primary problem debian will have with gcc 3.2 (or > 3.1.1 for that matter) is dealing with rebuilding glibc under it. > Because the gcc 3.1 fixed a bug relating to incorrectly linking in > libgcc symbols into binaries, glibc trunk and glibc

Bug#154525: g++-3.0: c++ symlink and alternatives are not created when installing

Package: g++-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.4-12 Severity: normal Alternatives for /usr/bin/c++ are not created/updated when installing g++-3.0. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux lappa 2.2.20 #1 Sat Apr 20 11:45:28 EST 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions o

re: Coexistence of gcc 3.2 and gcc 2.95

Martin, I think the primary problem debian will have with gcc 3.2 (or 3.1.1 for that matter) is dealing with rebuilding glibc under it. Because the gcc 3.1 fixed a bug relating to incorrectly linking in libgcc symbols into binaries, glibc trunk and glibc-2-2-branch have fixes to address this thr

Are YOU looking for a new website, to develop an existing website, for cheaper hosting or domain names?

We can help YOU to develop a new or existing website or even provide cheaper hosting and domain names.   Remove instructions below.   We are a UK based company who can offer YOU our considerable experience and expertise in the field of website design, eCommerce development, all types of web h

Coexistence of gcc 3.2 and gcc 2.95

When g++ 3.2 becomes the next Debian compiler, it will be necessary to recompile a lot of packages. Also, it will be necessary to have the old binary packages, and their shared libraries, coexist. Is there a specific plan to implement this coexistence? I can think of the following strategies: - d