>> Is this bug been reported to the Gnats GCC BTS (I don't see any
>> reference in bug #147864) ? If yes under which bug number ?
> It's ada/5679.
Thank you for the info. I'm cc'ing the Debian BTS for the record.
--
Laurent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
En réponse à [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
As a Java developer and Debian addict, I've been curious how "we're"
going about dealing with Sun's decision to move to gcc 3.1 in their next
incremental release of their JDK.
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4694590.html
(requires a login, I believe, major con
I'm forwarding this to the French translator, Michel Robitaille.
Michel, can you please correct these errors and submit a new catalog?
> This would be a bug in fr.po:
>
> | #: cp/call.c:2834
> | msgid "%s for `%T %s' operator"
> | msgstr "%s pour l'opÃrateur Â%T %sÂ"
> |
> | #: cp/call.c:2837
> |
5 matches
Mail list logo