Re: Problem with g++ ( solved )

2002-06-12 Thread Martin v. Loewis
"Kapil Khosla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess by reading the man page I have understood that g++ is just > a script which calls gcc compiler with options to recognize C++. That is not true (anymore); it is now a proper binary. Regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Problem with g++

2002-06-12 Thread Martin v. Loewis
"Kapil Khosla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought g++ was the C++ compiler , why do I have to upgrade gcc to > make it work. What really is g++ ? It is the C++ compiler driver (just like gcc is the C compiler driver). The C++ compiler proper is cc1plus (like cc1 for C). Regards, Martin --

Bug#149776: libstdc++4-dev: codecvt is missing some qualifications

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Piefel
Package: libstdc++4-dev Version: 1:3.1.1-0pre1 Severity: normal Tags: patch The file /usr/include/g++-v3-3.1/i386-linux/bits/codecvt_specializations.h (probably all other architectures as well) is missing some qualifications that were already mentioned in Bug #104614. Unfortunately, the patch was

Problem with g++ ( solved )

2002-06-12 Thread Kapil Khosla
I guess by reading the man page I have understood that g++ is just a script which calls gcc compiler with options to recognize C++. Thanks for your help. Kapil -- On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:33:07 Kapil Khosla wrote: > Thanks again >I just solved the problem using your mail . I saw that my gcc ver

Re: Problem with g++

2002-06-12 Thread Kapil Khosla
Thanks again I just solved the problem using your mail . I saw that my gcc version was 2.95.3 I upgraded to 2.95.4 and now g++ works fine. I thought g++ was the C++ compiler , why do I have to upgrade gcc to make it work. What really is g++ ? Thanks a lot, Kapil -- On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:23:0

Re: Problem with g++

2002-06-12 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:28:15 -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote: > dpkg -l g++-2.95 > > ii g++-2.95 2.95.4-7 The GNU C++ compiler. > > dpkg -l binutils > ii binutils 2.12.90.0.1-4 The GNU assembler, linker and binary > utilitils OK, those are the current versions for woody. (Ass

*****SPAM***** [±¤°í]Çѱ¹Ã౸16°­±â¿ø ÄûÁî¸ÂÃß°í¼±¹°¹ÞÀÚ.

2002-06-12 Thread Á¤Àç±â
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä! ¿ì¼± Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀϺ¸³½Á¡ Á˼ÛÇϱ¸¿ä.¼ö½ÅÀ» ¿øÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ÀÇ ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ Ŭ¸¯ÇØÁÖ¼¼¿ä! ´Ù¸§À̾ƴ϶ó 2002¿ùµåÄÅ Çѱ¹Ã౸ 16°­À» ±â¿øÇÏ´Â Àǹ̿¡¼­ ÀúÈñ¼îÇθô¿¡¼­´Â ½Å±Ôȸ¿øÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î À̺¥Æ®¸¦ ÁغñÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀº ¹«·á´Ï±î ¸¹ÀÌ Âü¿©ÇϽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù. °¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù. function openw

Bug#149708: g++-3.1: More info on this bug

2002-06-12 Thread Ivo Timmermans
Package: g++-3.1 Version: 1:3.1.1-0pre2 Followup-For: Bug #149708 Since this bug proved to be unreproducible on other machines, I'm providing you with some more info: * debsums reports that all files on my system are unchanged. * Preprocessing the file on another machine, where the bug does

Re: Problem with g++

2002-06-12 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 21:53:15 -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote: > I did an apt-get install g++-2.95 and am having problems using my C++ > compiler. Are you running testing or unstable? What is the version number of the g++-2.95 you installed ("dpkg -l g++-2.95")? > I get the error message > as: unre