On Sat, 25 May 2002, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 3.1-2
>
> It appears that the build scripts for the gcc 3.1 package are
> flawed in setting the configure paramaters. I find that when
> I build this package on debian ppc sid, the resulting gcc shows
>
> gcc -v
> Reading specs
Moin Matthias!
Matthias Klose schrieb am Thursday, den 30. May 2002:
> allegro now is at version 4.0. Please could you try to reproduce the
> behaviour with this version? Please could you try to recompile with
> gcc-3.1 (unstable)?
Works with gcc-3.1. I am impressed, all bugs I have found in gc?-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 140995 [fixed in gcc-3.1] -Wswitch (also part of -Wall) is broken
Bug#140995: gcc-3.0: -Wswitch (also part of -Wall) is broken
Changed Bug title.
> tags 140995 + fixed
Bug#140995: [fixed in gcc-3.1] -Wswitch (also part of -Wall) is broken
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 146253 [fixed in g++-3.1] Internal compiler error on arm
Bug#146253: Internal compiler error on arm
Changed Bug title.
> tags 146253 + fixed
Bug#146253: [fixed in g++-3.1] Internal compiler error on arm
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
Stopping proc
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2002 00:11:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug closed upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2002 00:13:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122114: feedback wanted on your Debian report #122114
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 144584 [fixed in g++-3.1] on ia64, internal compiler error with
> octave code
Bug#144584: g++-3.0: on ia64, internal compiler error with octave code
Changed Bug title.
> tags 144584 + fixed
Bug#144584: [fixed in g++-3.1] on ia64, internal comp
reassign 105741
thanks
allegro now is at version 4.0. Please could you try to reproduce the
behaviour with this version? Please could you try to recompile with
gcc-3.1 (unstable)?
Eduard Bloch writes:
> reopen 105741
> thanks
>
> > * Update to CVS sources (011014). Frozen for upstream 3.0.2 r
reassign 134262 glut3g
(Bthanks
(B
(Bthere is at least a bug in the glut3g package in that it does not
(Bdefine a dependency on libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2, although the shared
(Blibglut library is linked against it.
(B
(BBefore trying to compile / link with g++-3.x, xlibmesa needs to be
(Bcompi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 134262 glut3g
Bug#134262: g++-3.0: Use of dynamic_cast makes compiled program segfault
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.0' to `glut3g'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 148361 classpath
Bug#148361: libgcj3: /usr/lib/security/classpath.security is also in package
classpath
Bug reassigned from package `libgcj3' to `classpath'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 147864 gnat-3.1 fails to compile libgtkada
Bug#147864: gnat-3.1 does not provide gnat
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
reassign 148361 classpath
thanks
Well, libgcj3 was there before classpath ;-) So I'll let the classpath
maintainer find a solution.
Enrico Zini writes:
> Package: libgcj3
> Version: 1:3.1-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> when installing libgcj3:
>
> Unpacking libgcj3 (from .../libgcj3_1%3a3
> Please could you recheck with gcc-3.0.4 and gcc-3.1 (in unstable) and
> send the arguments you pass to reproduce the segfault? which command
> line do you use for compiling?
I have checked with gcc 3.0.4 and it does not trigger the bug. Moreover,
I have checked with the binary that gave me the s
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 14:47, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> i tested searchandrescue on arm with gcc 3.1. it worked,
Oh, cool. Want to try realtimebattle as well? :-)
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
i tested searchandrescue on arm with gcc 3.1. it worked, the only
thing you ahve to change is sar/platforms.ini and substitute
gcc-3.0/g++-3.0 with gcc-3.1/g++-3.1. it builds successfully
then.
the log can be found at
http://people.debian.org/~othmar/searchandrescue_gcc3.1.log
so long
Othmar
16 matches
Mail list logo