Bug#144184: g77-3.0: Please apply "big array" patch

2002-04-23 Thread Matthias Klose
David Starner writes: > Sorry, Matthias Klose seems to have taken down the GCC 3.1 packages. > Still, it's not that hard to compile from source. ??? http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/gcc/ beware, CVS snapshots of the 3.1 branch ... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#144184: g77-3.0: Please apply "big array" patch

2002-04-23 Thread David Starner
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:21:52AM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Package: g77-3.0 > Version: 1:3.0.3-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Please apply the "large array" patch found at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-10/msg01165.html so people can > actually use humungous (up to 2 GB) arrays with g77! It s

Bug#144184: g77-3.0: Please apply "big array" patch

2002-04-23 Thread David Starner
Sorry, Matthias Klose seems to have taken down the GCC 3.1 packages. Still, it's not that hard to compile from source. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's not a habit; it's cool; I feel alive. If you don't have it you're on the other side." - K's Choice (probably referring to the Interne

Bug#144232: g++-3.0: exception handling doesn't work with -O flags

2002-04-23 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Package: g++-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.4-7 Severity: normal Hello I'm adding my sample program which demonstrate that C++ program is unusable with -O2 (or better compilation) moreover it seems to be also affected by march=i5/686 flag check out 524000 iteration you may lower the char array a[10] - in

Bug#144184: g77-3.0: Please apply "big array" patch

2002-04-23 Thread Thomas Koenig
Package: g77-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.3-1 Severity: wishlist Please apply the "large array" patch found at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-10/msg01165.html so people can actually use humungous (up to 2 GB) arrays with g77! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

g++

2002-04-23 Thread Andrew Saunders
paths.push_back(p, "2"); mea culpa. must be paths.push_back("2"); but segfault happens... -- Andrew Saunders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: g++

2002-04-23 Thread alexander saltanov
AS> /** AS>Strange thing, but this piece of code may initiate segfault AS>near push_back in while. Is there an error in vector? AS>gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux) AS>void f() AS>{ AS

g++

2002-04-23 Thread Andrew Saunders
Hi everyone! May be I'm wrong and need to upgrade compiler, but yesterday I was surprised with segfault in the following well-compiled code. /** Strange thing, but this piece of code may initiate segfault near push_