Bug#115128: marked as done (cpp-2.95-doc: info cpp doesn't work)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:33:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in the current pinfo version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: merge gcc reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 134558 important Bug#134558: libc6.1: header coflicts on alpha with gcc-2.95.4 Severity set to `important'. > merge 134558 97603 Bug#97603: can't compile with define gnu_source on alpha with stdio and curses Bug#134558: libc6.1: header coflict

Processed: gcc reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 130415 [fixed in 3.0] g77 crashes Bug#130415: g77: g77 crashes Changed Bug title. > retitle 105285 [fixed in 3.0] libstdc++-2.10: doesn't define > trunc(...) Bug#105285: libstdc++-2.10: doesn't define trunc(...) Changed Bug title. > thanks

Processed: Re: Bug#134558: libc6.1: header coflicts on alpha with gcc-2.95.4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 134558 gcc-2.95 Bug#134558: libc6.1: header coflicts on alpha with gcc-2.95.4 Bug reassigned from package `libc6.1' to `gcc-2.95'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 106866 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#106866: gcc-3.0: Optimisation: [i386] pointless jump before a call Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > severity 106866 wishlist Bug#106866: gcc-3.0: Optimisation: [i386] pointle

Re: bug #132256

On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 05:25, Chris Cheney wrote: > I wanted to let you know about a bug I have against one of my packages. > It appears a fix wrt libtool/gcc (ppc) is not currently in Debian? File a bug against gcc-2.95 and/or gcc-3.0, whichever is appropriate. p.