Bug#130422: forwarded gcc bootstrap error on arm

2002-01-25 Thread Matthias Klose
upstream report is bootstrap/5209, currently open. accessible at http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl

Bug#124063: marked as done (gij: description could be better)

2002-01-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:58:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#124063: fixed in gcc-defaults 0.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#117285: marked as done (g77 has empty /usr/share/doc directory)

2002-01-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:58:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#117285: fixed in gcc-defaults 0.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#115127: marked as done (gcc-2.95-doc: Should Provide: gcc-doc)

2002-01-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:58:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#115127: fixed in gcc-defaults 0.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

gcc-defaults_0.17_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-01-25 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: chill_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-10_i386.deb cpp_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_2.95.4-10_i386.deb g++_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_2.95.4-10_i386.deb g77_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
reassign 130591 binutils thanks I'm reassigning this to binutils. Chris, seems to be a woody-only bug... On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 08:18:41PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils > > > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > > > > |Statu

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > reassign 130591 binutils > thanks > > I'm reassigning this to binutils. Chris, seems to be a woody-only > bug... Hold on, apt-get install gcc binutils fixed that on the woody. So it probably *used to be* binutils bug ;-). Pav

Processed: Re: Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 130591 binutils Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `binutils'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils > > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > > > |Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > > > uppercase=bad) > > > ||/ Name

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > You'll also note that my versions are later than yours. Please update > yourself, as the problem does not exist in relatively current unstable. I did apt-get install binutils gcc on the school machine, and problem went away, so it seems newer versions fix that.

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils > > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > > > |Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > > > uppercase=bad) > > > ||/ Name

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 08:00:04PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > > |Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problem

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > |Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name Version

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > |Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name Version Description > +++--===

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold |Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description

Processed: raising severity: build error on arm

2002-01-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 128422 serious Bug#128422: gcc-2.95: build problem on arm Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

[no subject]

2002-01-25 Thread Pierre Lombard
Submitter-Id: net Originator: Pierre Lombard Synopsis: wrongcode when optimizing mmx asm inline Severity: serious Priority: medium Confidential: no Category: optimization Class: wrong-code Release:3.0.3 (Debian testing/unstable) Environment: System:

Re: dependancy problem....

2002-01-25 Thread Alexei Khlebnikov
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:22:18 +0100 "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: JD(> [Please do not use HTML in email. This is email, not the web] JD(> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 16:57:10 +1300, Etienne Le Sueur wrote: >> I have recently tried to install g++, using dpkg. When I do so, dpkg >> re

Re: dependancy problem....

2002-01-25 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
[Please do not use HTML in email. This is email, not the web] On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 16:57:10 +1300, Etienne Le Sueur wrote: > I have recently tried to install g++, using dpkg. When I do so, dpkg > reports a dependancy problem with libstdc++-dev. > > Ok, now when I go to install libstdc++-dev t

Re: Internal compiler error - signal 5 (athlon 1.2GHz)

2002-01-25 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 23:38:00 +0100, Michal Kolesar wrote: > There is a problem with HW? Not necessarily. It may be a problem with the way the hardware is configured, or with the drivers you're using and there is still a small chance it really is a problem in gcc. > Or in gcc? I doubt it. If