Re: gpc problems in 2.95

2002-01-01 Thread Matthias Klose
[CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; the gpc version is the RC2, the gcc version 2.95.4 CVS] Philip Blundell writes: > The version of gpc in the 2001-12-23 upload doesn't seem to work on arm, > sparc, m68k or s390; they all seem to segfault somewhere during the build. > > ../.././xgpc -B../.././ -c -I. -W

Bug#127263: man pages for libstdc++ would be nice

2002-01-01 Thread Matthias Klose
reopen 127263 thanks Morten Brix Pedersen writes: > * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-01 17:21:43]: > > They are. See /usr/doc/libstdc++3-doc/libstdc++/html_user/ > > I'm talking about shipping the man-pages with the package, so you can do > "man ", HTML reference isn't the same.

Bug#127263: man pages for libstdc++ would be nice

2002-01-01 Thread Morten Brix Pedersen
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-01 17:21:43]: > They are. See /usr/doc/libstdc++3-doc/libstdc++/html_user/ I'm talking about shipping the man-pages with the package, so you can do "man ", HTML reference isn't the same. - Morten.

Bug#127263: marked as done (man pages for libstdc++ would be nice)

2002-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2002 17:15:33 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#127263: man pages for libstdc++ would be nice has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Re: Bug#126703: g++-3.0: defines _GNU_SOURCE with g++-3.0

2002-01-01 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> > > possibly include a glibc header, otherwise certain C++ programs will > > > simply fail out of the box. > > > > I don't believe that this is true. > [...] > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2000-12/msg00215.html > > Well, there's my example. :-) Just to make sure we are talking abou