Re: profiling support for i386-gnu specs file

2001-12-28 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 07:53:31PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > >Description: > I fixed the Hurd specs file to support profiling (which was broken > for statically linked programs). The specs file I successfully used > is attached, an analysis of what it does (or should do) is in the > table b

Bug#126675: gcc: please honor user's gcc symlink setting

2001-12-28 Thread Joseph Carter
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:11:46PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > That's a bit less hackish I suppose than futzing with the symlink > > directly, but I still believe /etc/alternatives would be a good thing > > here. If you disagree, that's fine, but I'd ask that the gcc symlink move > > to gcc-3

Bug#126675: gcc: please honor user's gcc symlink setting

2001-12-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Joseph Carter writes: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 02:37:31PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > using dpkg-divert should work even when upgrading the package. > > That's a bit less hackish I suppose than futzing with the symlink > directly, but I still believe /etc/alternatives would be a good thing >

Bug#126675: gcc: please honor user's gcc symlink setting

2001-12-28 Thread Joseph Carter
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 02:37:31PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > using dpkg-divert should work even when upgrading the package. That's a bit less hackish I suppose than futzing with the symlink directly, but I still believe /etc/alternatives would be a good thing here. If you disagree, that's fi

profiling support for i386-gnu specs file

2001-12-28 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Marcus Brinkmann >Organization: To organize is to destroy. >Confidential: no >Synopsis: profiling support for i386-gnu specs file >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: target >Class: sw-bug >Release: 3.0.2 (Debian)

Processed: Re: Bug#126675: gcc: please honor user's gcc symlink setting

2001-12-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 126675 112887 Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug#126675: gcc: please honor user's gcc symlink setting Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism Bug#119952: gcc-3.0: could gcc-3.0 be hooked into the alternatives system? M

Bug#126675: gcc: please honor user's gcc symlink setting

2001-12-28 Thread Matthias Klose
merge 126675 112887 tags 126675 + wontfix thanks using dpkg-divert should work even when upgrading the package. Joseph Carter writes: > Package: gcc > Version: 2:2.95.4-9 > Severity: wishlist > > I have changed the gcc symlink on my system to point to gcc-3.0 to help > work out the kinks with th

Re: Bug#126703: g++-3.0: defines _GNU_SOURCE with g++-3.0

2001-12-28 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> This is evil ;-) I agree. It would be better if c++config.h would take compiler and library configurations into account. For *-*-linux-gnu, c++config.h should contain fragments like #ifdef __USE_ISOC99 #define _GLIBCPP_USE_C99 1 #endif That would remove the need to define _GNU_SOURCE in the co

Bug#123155: gcc-3.0 does not build on PPC

2001-12-28 Thread Geoff Keating
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:54:00 +1030 > From: Alan Modra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED], Geoff Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Disposition: inline > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i > X-OriginalArrival