Re: building for the first time

2001-12-16 Thread Andrew Hurt
Thanks, Matthias. OK. I'm feeling better, now. I don't seem to have the mail-transfer set up correctly (no logs sent) ;-( I have more unexpected failures than the reference log, though). My goal is to compile gcc, &c., and install the .debs. Somewhat confused about optimization: the gcc doc s

Bug#123685: patch for ia64 build problem

2001-12-16 Thread Randolph Chung
# bcc [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag 123685 + patch thanks For the record, this updated NaT patch will allow ia64 to build... but we are waiting for confirmation from upstream. randolph -- Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.TauSq.org/ #! /bin/sh -e # DP: ia64 NaT bug fix # DP: https://e

Processed: patch for ia64 build problem

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 123685 + patch Bug#123685: gcc-3.0_3.0.3ds0 does not build on ia64 Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

[buildd@europa.armlinux.org] Log for failed build of gcc-3.0_1:3.0.3ds2-0pre011215 (dist=unstable)

2001-12-16 Thread Philip Blundell
Does anybody know what the deal is here? p. -- if [ -x debian/patches/libffi-install.dpatch ]; then true; else chmod +x debian/patches/libffi-install.dpatch; fi if [ -f stamps/02-patch-stamp-libffi-install ]; then \ echo "libffi-install patches already applied."; exit 1; \ fi debian/patches/l

Bug#123790: marked as done (libstdc++3-doc: bad reference to HEADER_POLICY)

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 12:04:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU of gcc-3.0 1:3.0.3ds2-0pre011215 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t