Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 3.0.3ds0-1
Severity: serious
/xgcc -B./ -B/usr/ia64-linux/bin/ -isystem /usr/ia64-linux/include -isystem /us
r/ia64-linux/sys-include -O2 -DIN_GCC-W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-pro
totypes -Wmissing-prototypes -isystem ./include -fPIC -g1 -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -
> What is the best (easiest :) way to get a gcc capable of
> producing i386-aout targets? I've apt-getted the source of
> gcc-2.95, but it has really scared me, and I didn't found
> the way to accomplish this.
I would recommend to download an old binary, say from SLS 1.0 or so.
It will come as a
James Troup writes:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe this should be a bug report; who knows. Basically, sparc can't
> build gcc-3.0 and won't be able to (AFAICS) unless a) somone mucks
> around with things by hand or b) something changes in the gcc-3.0
> source package. The problem is that the existing cpp-3.0 (
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.3-0pre011209
I've hit a internal compiler error in the gcc-3.0 package. The
following code will trigger the error:
struct blah
{
char * foo;
char * bar[];
};
int main()
{
struct blah test;
test.bar =
Please stop cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED], by the way. That only works for
appending to an existing PR, and there is no PR to append to. So their
GNATS database pukes.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:18:45PM -0600, James E Jurach Jr. wrote:
> > Compilers are allowed to optimize static const integral m
Hi,
Maybe this should be a bug report; who knows. Basically, sparc can't
build gcc-3.0 and won't be able to (AFAICS) unless a) somone mucks
around with things by hand or b) something changes in the gcc-3.0
source package. The problem is that the existing cpp-3.0 (3.0.2) for
sparc <<-depends on a
Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
> What is the best (easiest :) way to get a gcc capable of
> producing i386-aout targets? I've apt-getted the source of
> gcc-2.95, but it has really scared me, and I didn't found
> the way to accomplish this.
AFAIK, producing i386-aout targets is a linker's, not compiler
Hello.
What is the best (easiest :) way to get a gcc capable of
producing i386-aout targets? I've apt-getted the source of
gcc-2.95, but it has really scared me, and I didn't found
the way to accomplish this.
--
Regards, Wartan.
"Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are."
> Right. I'm reporting that
>
> 1) gcc's behavior changed in this regard in 2.96 and 3.00 from 2.95 and
>previous, and
Why is that a problem? The compiler does not need to be consistent.
> 2) gcc sometimes uses these values directly without defining the variables,
>while other times gc
9 matches
Mail list logo
