> > It does compile cleanly when replacing with or with
> > .
>
> It may be that that is the proper way to do it; I'm not familiar enough with
> STL to know. Perhaps someone on debian-gcc can comment on this?
Including is certainly the wrong approach; it gives you an rb
tree, not a hash table.
03:34:10 tmp]$ cat main.cc
#include
int main(void) {}
[03:34:43 tmp]$ g++-3.0 -Wall main.cc
main.cc:1:20: hash_map: No such file or directory
[03:35:36 tmp]$
How one can get the hash_map container? According to the STL
documentation it is defined in the header hash_map.
There is a /usr/inclu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 119952 gcc
Bug#119952: gcc-3.0: could gcc-3.0 be hooked into the alternatives system?
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.0' to `gcc'.
> tags 119952 + wontfix
Bug#119952: gcc-3.0: could gcc-3.0 be hooked into the alternatives system?
Tags added
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.2-3
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I think it would be nice, if the different
flavours of gcc would use the alternatives
system provided by `update-alternatives'.
So the system administrator could choose between
gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0 in an easy way. Would this
be possi
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 15:59:04 +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> [15:50:23 tmp]$ g++-3.0 -Wall -ggdb -o main main.cc
> main.cc:1:20: hash_map: No such file or directory
> [15:50:27 tmp]$ wc /usr/include/g++-3/hash_map
Add a '-v' to your command line, and you'll see that that directory isn't
searched:
> Seen on two machines including latest debian unstable, so I hope I'm
> not hallucinating:
>
> gcc -Wall -W -Wfloat-equal -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-qual -Wconversion
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -I.
> -I/3dsar1/asf_tools/src_lib/asf_inc
> -I/3dsar1/asf_tools/src_lib/asf_odl/incl
6 matches
Mail list logo
