Bug#116145: forwarded message from Adam Heath

2001-10-25 Thread Per Bothner
Matthias Klose wrote: Not only does fastjar obliterate existing contents in a jar when updating, but, it appears it can also corrupt the file. Yes, I ran into the same problem. Basically the implementation of 'u' is pretty much not there. I looked at trying to fix it, but decided I didn't have t

Bug#116484: marked as done (gcj-3.0: gcj executable has no man page)

2001-10-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:58:05 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#116484: gcj-3.0: gcj executable has no man page has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Re: Bug#116823: Debian's g++-3.0 forgets to generate some code.

2001-10-25 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> I don't like this `construct on first use' idiom at all, aesthetically. Isn't this exactly what you want, and what modules.h does? If module A uses module B, construction of A first constructs B. > I find it disgusting to use a function call for that and a > preprocessor symbol. Well, you do

Bug#117067: gcc-doc: version should be higher

2001-10-25 Thread Anna Jonna Armannsdottir
Package: gcc-doc Version: N/A Severity: normal gcc conflicts with gcc-doc (<< 2.95.3) -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux brick 2.4.10.worker.2 #1 tir sep 25 02:54:02 CEST 2001 i686 unknown

Re: Bug#116823: Debian's g++-3.0 forgets to generate some code.

2001-10-25 Thread Richard B. Kreckel
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > I'd say that the best solution would be to get rid of globals. This is > actually very easy: > > If you have > > TYPE VAR = INITIALIZER; > > replace that with > > TYPE& getVAR(){ > static TYPE obj = INITIALIZER; > return obj; > } > > Then use