Processed: Re: Bug#115583: g++-2.96: can't compile ddt

2001-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 115583 g++-2.96 Bug#115583: g++-2.96: can't compile ddt Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.96'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#115299: marked as done (gpc 2:2.95.4-7 install fails if old gpc-doc is installed)

2001-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2001 14:57:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#115299: fixed in gcc-defaults 0.15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

gcc-defaults_0.15_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-10-14 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: gobjc_2.95.4-8_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gobjc_2.95.4-8_i386.deb gcc-defaults_0.15.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_0.15.dsc g77_2.95.4-8_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_2.95.4-8_i386.deb gpc_2.95.4-8_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gpc_2.95

Bug#115583: g++-2.96: can't compile ddt

2001-10-14 Thread James Troup
Package: g++ Version: 1:2.96-5 Severity: important I wasn't able to verify that it compiles with g++-3.0 due to the library incompatability problems, but I suspect it does. | Automatic build of ddt_0.5.2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.159 | Build started at 20011014

Re: Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
> > 'preferred' by whom? I think that this should be controlled by > > sysadmin. The whole 'alternatives' system for making easy > > for sysadmin to change defaults. Why gcc is exception? > > ld and as are exceptions as well. > > use the system compiler to build libfoo, change the system com

Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread Matthias Klose
marko writes: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > marko writes: > > > As in subject: I think that cc and gcc should be provided > > > through update-alternatives mechanism, so user could > > > switch between gcc272, gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0 more easily. > > > > > > Eg

Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread marko
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > marko writes: > > As in subject: I think that cc and gcc should be provided > > through update-alternatives mechanism, so user could > > switch between gcc272, gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0 more easily. > > > > Eg. use gcc-3.0 for cc but gcc

Bug#115128: cpp-2.95-doc: info cpp doesn't work

2001-10-14 Thread Matthias Klose
Jordi Mallach writes: > Package: cpp-2.95-doc > Version: 1:2.95.4-0.011006 > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > If you do "pinfo gcc", you get the gcc-2.95 manual pages, but this doesn't > happen for cpp too. If I do "pinfo gcc", I just get the manual page. > > The bug about cpp-2.95-doc providing

Bug#109671: marked as done (gcc3 fails compiling php406 (mbfilter.c/segfault))

2001-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2001 16:37:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#109671: gcc3 fails compiling php406 (mbfilter.c/segfault) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#110791: Internal compiler error (signal 11) when using -march=i686

2001-10-14 Thread Matthias Klose
Peter de Zwart writes: > Package: gcc > Version: 1:2.95.2-13 > Severity: normal > > While compiling libvorbis-1.0rc2 from xiphophorus (http://www.ogg.org) the > compiler got an internal compiler error (signal 11) on the following file: > > lib/envelope.c > > I did a "make distclean", unset CFLAG

Processed: reassign gcc bug

2001-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 50559 toolchain-source Bug#50559: gcc: would be nice if it were possible to easily create cross-compiler packages Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `toolchain-source'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 112887 gcc Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.0' to `gcc'. > merge 115353 112887 Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism Merged 112887 115353. > than

Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 115353 + wontfix merge 115353 112887 thanks marko writes: > Package: gcc > Version: 2:2.95.4-6 > Severity: wishlist > > As in subject: I think that cc and gcc should be provided > through update-alternatives mechanism, so user could > switch between gcc272, gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0 more easily.

Processed: Re: Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 115353 + wontfix Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism Tags added: wontfix > merge 115353 112887 Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism Mismatch - only Bugs