Bug#103051: fastjar: Please include man page

Package: fastjar Version: 1:3.0-3 Severity: normal Hi. Would it be possible to add a man page for fastjar? Thanks - Ben. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux emerald 2.4.4-686 #1 Sun Apr 29 12:22:40 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Ver

Re: GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?

On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 12:02:18 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 03:41:28PM -0700, Justin Guyett wrote: > > rh gcc 2.96 snapshot. Does the 2.95.4 snapshot used by debian have those > > two patches in it? > > I believe they have the atexit patch, it is in CVS after all. > Dunno ab

Processed: reassign g++ bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 21255 g++-2.95 Bug#21255: g++ has some troubles with nested templates Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'. > tags 21255 + fixed Bug#21255: g++ has some troubles with nested templates Tags added: fixed > retitle 21255 [fixed in 3.0

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #85445 to gcc-gnats as PR 3504

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 85445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#85445: gcc: __alignof__ not working correctly Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 85445 [PR c/3504]: __alignof__ not working correctly Bug#85445: gcc: __alignof__ not wor

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #89949 to gcc-gnats as PR 3506

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 89949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#89949: gcc: weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 89949 [PR optimization/3506]: weird behaviour when incrementing > volatil

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #75773 to gcc-gnats as PR 3507

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 75773 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#75773: gcc: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 75773 [PR optimization/3507]: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on > i386 B

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #85535 to gcc-gnats as PR 3508

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 85535 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#85535: gcc: builtin memcmp() could be optimised Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 85535 [PR optimization/3508]: builtin memcmp() could be optimised Bug#85535: gcc: buil

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #86251 to gcc-gnats as PR 3511

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 86251 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#86251: gcc: Inlined strlen() could be smarter Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 86251 [PR optimization/3511]: Inlined strlen() could be smarter Bug#86251: gcc: Inlined

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #88959 to gcc-gnats as PR 3513

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 88959 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#88959: gcc: GCC doesn't merge substrings Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 88959 [PR optimization/3513]: GCC doesn't merge substrings Bug#88959: gcc: GCC doesn't merge

Re: the "Drepper" thread

Ben Collins writes: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > I see that we do not have the patch > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg00748.html > > > > applied in the Debian packages. The other patch mentioned comes from > > the branch. > > I thou

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #94701 to gcc-gnats as PR 2960

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 94701 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#94701: gcc-3.0: Duplicate loop conditions even with -Os Forwarded-to-address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 94701 [PR optimization/2960] Duplicate loop conditions even with -Os Bug#94

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #97904 to gcc-gnats as PR 2963

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 97904 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#97904: gcc-3.0: Pointless moving Forwarded-to-address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 97904 [PR optimization/2963] pointless moving Bug#97904: gcc-3.0: Pointless moving Changed Bug tit

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #95318 to gcc-gnats as PR 2962

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 95318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#95318: gcc-3.0: unnecessary cwtl Forwarded-to-address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 95318 [PR optimization/2962] unnecessary cwtl Bug#95318: gcc-3.0: unnecessary cwtl Changed Bug tit

GCC doesn't merge substrings

elease: 3.0 (Debian GNU/Linux) and HEAD 20010701 >Environment: System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable) Architecture: i686 host: i386-linux build: i386-linux target: i386-linux configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --i

Inlined strlen() could be smarter

Release: 3.0 (Debian GNU/Linux) and HEAD 20010701 >Environment: System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable) Architecture: i686 host: i386-linux build: i386-linux target: i386-linux configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --infodi

builtin memcmp() could be optimised

Release: 3.0 (Debian GNU/Linux) and HEAD 20010701 >Environment: System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable) Architecture: i686 host: i386-linux build: i386-linux target: i386-linux configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --in

appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386

pessimizes-code >Release: 3.0 (Debian GNU/Linux) and HEAD 20010701 >Environment: System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable) Architecture: i686 host: i386-linux build: i386-linux target: i386-linux configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --p

weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints

es-code >Release: 3.0 (Debian GNU/Linux) and HEAD 20010701 >Environment: System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable) Architecture: i686 host: i386-linux build: i386-linux target: i386-linux configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --p

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle #84969 [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug#84969: php4 doesn't compile on arm Changed Bug title. > retitle #83550 [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug#83550: Stable gcc can't compile PHP4 4.0.3 on arm Changed Bug title. > fo

Processed: reassign report to gcc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 84969 gcc Bug#84969: php4 doesn't compile on arm Bug#83550: Stable gcc can't compile PHP4 4.0.3 on arm Bug reassigned from package `php4' to `gcc'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (a

Processed: reassign gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 43170 g++-2.95 Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `g++-2.95'. > tags 43170 + fixed Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class

Processed: forwarded gcc bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 100166 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Bug#100166: gcc-3.0: internal compiler error: unrecognized insn Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

gcc-3_0 march=athlon && (-Os || -ggdb)

sorry for the late response. Gordon Sadler writes: > I understand the athon code is new (and mostly/somewhat untested?). I > also understand the kernel itself is having problems with 2.4.x and > athlon code WRT some VIA chipsets (I have one and innumerable oopses > sent to lkml). All of my com

Processed: tagging gcc reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 102473 + unreproduceable Unknown tag/s: unreproduceable. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending. Bug#102473: #include_next does not work correctly in std_cstdio.h (and others) T

Bug#81181: marked as done (gcc: sig 11, reproducible and not machine-specific)

Your message dated Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:28:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed with gcc-2.95.4 and gcc-3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processed: gcc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 20695 normal Bug#20695: regparm/profiling breakage (fixed with gcc-3.0) Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #55298 to gcc-gnats as PR 3481

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 55298 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#55298: function attributes should apply to function pointers too Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 55298 [PR c/3481] function attributes should apply to function > poi

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #101732 to gcc-gnats as PR 3315

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 101732 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#101732: g++-3.0 ICE compiling mozilla Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 101732 [PR optimization/3315] ICE compiling mozilla with -O3 Bug#101732: g++-3.0 ICE compiling

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #81122 to gcc-gnats as PR 3494

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 81122 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#81122: Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though) Forwarded-to-address changed from gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 81122 [PR c++/3494] Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though) B

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #85908 to gcc-gnats as PR 3487

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 85908 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#85908: gcc/cpp/stddef.h Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 85908 [PR preprocessor/3487] unrecognized token before #include > points to wrong source Bug#85908: gcc/cpp/s

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #99038 to gcc-gnats as PR 3490

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 99038 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#99038: internal error using static synchronized Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 99038 [PR java/3490] internal error using static synchronized Bug#99038: internal erro

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #102353 to gcc-gnats as PR 3492

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 102353 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#102353: -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W gives strange message Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 102353 [PR java/3492] -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W