Bug#100535: marked as done (gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct (?) code)

2001-06-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:15:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#100535: gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#100535: gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct

2001-06-11 Thread Alan Cox
> On 11 Jun 01 at 13:58, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > gcc_3.0-3.0-0pre010609 refuses to compile Linux kernel > > > because of it does not treat following code as correct > > > anymore. gcc-2.95.4-20010604 and gcc-3.0-20010426 both > > > compile this code without any complaints. > > > > > >

Bug#100535: gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct

2001-06-11 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 11 Jun 01 at 13:58, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > gcc_3.0-3.0-0pre010609 refuses to compile Linux kernel > > because of it does not treat following code as correct > > anymore. gcc-2.95.4-20010604 and gcc-3.0-20010426 both > > compile this code without any complaints. > > > > --- > > #inc

Bug#100535: gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct (?) code

2001-06-11 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:33:33PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > Package: gcc-3.0 > Version: 3.0-0pre010609 > > Hi, > gcc_3.0-3.0-0pre010609 refuses to compile Linux kernel > because of it does not treat following code as correct > anymore. gcc-2.95.4-20010604 and gcc-3.0-20010426 both > compil

Bug#100543: open.o uses tempnam instead of mkstemp

2001-06-11 Thread Tom Epperly
Package: g77-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-0.010424 Severity: normal I've got a mixed language program that has FORTRAN 77 and C. It runs cleanly on other Unix-like operating systems, but when I ran it on Linux, I see the follow message once when a F77 program is run: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/

Bug#100535: gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct (?) code

2001-06-11 Thread Petr Vandrovec
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 3.0-0pre010609 Hi, gcc_3.0-3.0-0pre010609 refuses to compile Linux kernel because of it does not treat following code as correct anymore. gcc-2.95.4-20010604 and gcc-3.0-20010426 both compile this code without any complaints. --- #include extern struct timeval xt

Re: gcc-3.0 update

2001-06-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:23:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Yesterday I uploaded new gcc-3.0 packages. Close before the gcc > release I'd like to check the status of the Debian architecutres: > > alpha - 010526 > arm - 010526, no java > i386 - 010609 > hppa - 010427, no java, "old" ABI,

Bug#100483: gcc-3.0-doc: dangling symbolic link

2001-06-11 Thread Michael Osamu Shiobara
Package: gcc-3.0-doc Version: 1:3.0-0pre010609 Severity: normal Hello, This package creates a dangling symbolic link as follows: dangling: /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.0-base/gcc-300.info.gz -> ../../info/gcc-3.0.info.gz `/usr/share/info/gcc-3.0.info.gz' does not exist. This link should refer to `/u

Re: gcc-3.0 update

2001-06-11 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:23:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > hurd - should bootstrap (CVS 010610 needed?). Okay, thanks. My last attempt wasn't succesful, but I'll try again. Tks, Jeff Bailey

gcc-3.0 update

2001-06-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Yesterday I uploaded new gcc-3.0 packages. Close before the gcc release I'd like to check the status of the Debian architecutres: alpha - 010526 arm - 010526, no java i386- 010609 hppa- 010427, no java, "old" ABI, Matt Taggert working on a new patch powerpc - 010609, no java (link er