>
> | OK, fine. The question remains: is this a legal construct, or not?
>
> The constructs you sent were all ill-formed. See 14.6/5 of the C++
> definition text.
Or see C.13.5 in The C++ Programming Language 3rd Ed. (pp. 856-858)
j.
--
Put your leader at the back. This means there is les
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| >
| > | C++ allows the word 'typename' after a 'using' directive. _The C++ Pro
| > gramming Language_ (third edition) [Stroustrup], section A.7
(Grammar/Declara
| > tions) defines the using directive:
| > | using-declaration:
| > |
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> | C++ allows the word 'typename' after a 'using' directive. _The C++ Pro
> gramming Language_ (third edition) [Stroustrup], section A.7 (Grammar/Declara
> tions) defines the using directive:
> | using-declaration:
> | "using" "typename"(opt) "::
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| C++ allows the word 'typename' after a 'using' directive. _The C++
Programming Language_ (third edition) [Stroustrup], section A.7
(Grammar/Declarations) defines the using directive:
| using-declaration:
| "using" "typename"(opt) "::"(opt) n
>Submitter-Id: net-debian
>Originator:Seth M LaForge
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: The 'using typename' construct won't compile
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: c++
>Class: rejects-legal
>Release: 3.0 20010526 (Debian prereleas
Package: gcj-3.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
An upcoming release of Debian policy, version 3.5.5.0, contains an amendment
which clarifies the way man pages need to be installed.
Until now, packages could install /usr/share/man/man1/foo.1.gz with 'foo,
bar \- programs to do something' in the NAME sectio
I can consistently produce Segmentation Faults and/or ICE's when using
gcc-3.0 with the above options on large projects (ie gcc 3 and mainline,
glibc CVS mainline).
I have submitted at least one PR to glibc PRlibc/2286(their gnats is down -( )
and one to gcc PR2968
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnats
7 matches
Mail list logo
