Jack Howarth writes:
>Is there a particular reason why the tarball for building gcc-2.95
> 2.95.4.ds1-0.010502 was not uploaded to incoming.debian.org? Could
> someone please get it up there with the rest of the files for that
> version of the package? Thanks.
It didn't change, so it wasn
Is there a particular reason why the tarball for building gcc-2.95
2.95.4.ds1-0.010502 was not uploaded to incoming.debian.org? Could
someone please get it up there with the rest of the files for that
version of the package? Thanks.
Jack
Ben Collins writes:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:16:14AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > it's strange that calling dh_gencontrol directly, correctly generates
> > the Architecture fields. Does dh_gencontrol / dpkg-gencontrol depend
> > on some environment?
> >
>
> Try setting DH_COM
Package: libgcj2-dev
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010427
Severity: grave
libgcj2-dev must depend on libgcj2. Without libgcj2 installed
e.g. all /usr/lib/lib*.so links are dangling symlinks.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:16:14AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> it's strange that calling dh_gencontrol directly, correctly generates
> the Architecture fields. Does dh_gencontrol / dpkg-gencontrol depend
> on some environment?
>
Try setting DH_COMPAT and see if that changes calling it manua
Previously Matthias Klose wrote:
> it's strange that calling dh_gencontrol directly, correctly generates
> the Architecture fields. Does dh_gencontrol / dpkg-gencontrol depend
> on some environment?
dpkg-gencontrol does not.
Wichert.
--
___
Ben Collins writes:
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:14:48PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Ben Collins writes:
> > > Which version of dpkg-dev do you have installed?
> >
> > $ dpkg -l dpkg-dev
> > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> > |
> > Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacke
7 matches
Mail list logo