On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 05:38:17PM -0600, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Hi debian-gcc,
>
> FYI...
>
> I built newer gcc-3.0 packages for hppa based on a cvs snapshot most recently
> synced up with upstream cvs on 2001-04-15. So basically I just replaced the
> gcc-20010403.tar.bz2 tarball with a newer o
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 05:38:17PM -0600, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Hi debian-gcc,
>
> FYI...
>
> I built newer gcc-3.0 packages for hppa based on a cvs snapshot most recently
> synced up with upstream cvs on 2001-04-15. So basically I just replaced the
> gcc-20010403.tar.bz2 tarball with a newer o
Hi debian-gcc,
FYI...
I built newer gcc-3.0 packages for hppa based on a cvs snapshot most recently
synced up with upstream cvs on 2001-04-15. So basically I just replaced the
gcc-20010403.tar.bz2 tarball with a newer one. When building I ran into a
patch failure with debian/patches/sonames.dp
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 12:57:47AM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
> > You may want to approach this a different way, since this makes "Linux" the
> > norm, and "Hurd" the deviant. It would probably be better to test if
> > the DEB_HOST_ARCH were a member of the "Linux" family. I don't know a
> > go
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 12:19:37AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Is the ulimit critical to the test suite? If not, can you wrap the 'awk' and
> 'ulimit' lines with
>
> ifneq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),hurd-i386)
> m=`awk '/^((Mem|Swap)Free|Cached)/{m+=$$2}END{print int(m*.9)}' \
>/
Package: gcc-2.95
Severity: important
The testsuite in rules2 (appears twice) does:
+ -echo "Running testsuite ..."; \
+ m=`awk '/^((Mem|Swap)Free|Cached)/{m+=$$2}END{print int(m*.9)}' \
+ /proc/meminfo`; \
+ ulimit -m $$m; \
+ echo "Limited memory for
6 matches
Mail list logo