Re: gcc-3.0 snapshot...

2001-04-03 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:45:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Ben Collins writes: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build

Re: gcc-3.0 snapshot...

2001-04-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Ben Collins writes: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc > > > 2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were n

Re: gcc-3.0 snapshot...

2001-04-03 Thread Gordon Sadler
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:14:50PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc > > > 2.2.3pre1 with it on sp

Re: gcc-3.0 snapshot...

2001-04-03 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc > > 2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors > > from the glibc make

Bug#92771: gcc-2.95 package description

2001-04-03 Thread Patrick W. Yaner
Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 2.95.3.ds5-10 The package description for this package (and every package the source distribution builds) starts with the following note: NOTE: This is not a final release, but taken from the CVS gcc-2_95-branch (dated 20010125). However, it looks from the upstream

Re: gcc-3.0 snapshot...

2001-04-03 Thread Gordon Sadler
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc > 2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors > from the glibc make check, and the library installed without any > problems. > > I notice

Re: gcc-3.0 snapshot...

2001-04-03 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Ben Collins wrote: > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc > 2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors > from the glibc make check, and the library installed without any > problems. Woohoo! That's good news for my

gcc-3.0 snapshot...

2001-04-03 Thread Ben Collins
For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc 2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors from the glibc make check, and the library installed without any problems. I noticed that right now, libc.so.6 does not link with libgcc.so, which is a good