Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-06-01 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
> The same problems as toolchains for unstable from Emdebian - the > packages don't install because the dependencies keep on moving ahead No. Dependencies didn't move ahead. If they moved ahead we would be able to see their following versions in repo. But gcc depends on library version 4.6.0-8 a

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-06-01 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
On śro, 2011-06-01 at 10:36 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:21:54 +0200 > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > My packages does not require hacking to get cross compiler installed. > > To be fair, the Emdebian ones don't either - but everyone using any > toolchain is going to need

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-06-01 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:21:54 +0200 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > On śro, 2011-06-01 at 10:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > > I do not provide packages for Debian but if someone wants I can share > > > results of my recent builds. > > > > The same problems as toolchains for unstable from Emdebian

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-06-01 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
On śro, 2011-06-01 at 10:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:45:15 +0200 > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > > On śro, 2011-06-01 at 09:34 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > > Right now, nobody cares about cross-compilers in unstable because we > > > don't have time to waste. > > >

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-06-01 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:45:15 +0200 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > On śro, 2011-06-01 at 09:34 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > Right now, nobody cares about cross-compilers in unstable because we > > don't have time to waste. > > What about cross-toolchain project at alioth? I am working on getting

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-06-01 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
On śro, 2011-06-01 at 09:34 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > All the effort needs to go into developing a replacement mechanism > where the cross-compiler toolchains can be built ALONGSIDE the new > compiler versions by the Debian buildd infrastructure because then those > packages become subject to

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-06-01 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:59:58 +0400 "Dmitry E. Oboukhov" wrote: > > > Use toolchains from stable - THAT is where all the effort reaps rewards. > > > Please don't distract people into trying to fix the unfixable. > > > Stable is the priority. > > I uderstansd that You said, but can't agree. It

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-05-31 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
> Use toolchains from stable - THAT is where all the effort reaps rewards. > Please don't distract people into trying to fix the unfixable. > Stable is the priority. I uderstansd that You said, but can't agree. Stable wont't be able to be Stable if nobody can test Testing. > fix the unfixabl

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-05-30 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:29:12 +0400 "Dmitry E. Oboukhov" wrote: > > Sid itself is always problematic because new versions of critical > > packages get uploaded independently > > Of course, I agree all You said. > But in Sid such cases lead us to RC bugreports. Only for Debian packages. Cross-com

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-05-30 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
> Sid itself is always problematic because new versions of critical > packages get uploaded independently Of course, I agree all You said. But in Sid such cases lead us to RC bugreports. I opened the thread after a few weeks of the problem was. :) -- . ''`. Dmitry

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-05-30 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:35:01 +0400 "Dmitry E. Oboukhov" wrote: > >> squeeze contains gcc-4.3-arm-inux-gnueabi > >> I wanted to install the latest version of the package, but a few > >> binary depends are absent :) Latest versions are always vulnerable to delays which make that version uninstalla

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-05-29 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
>> squeeze contains gcc-4.3-arm-inux-gnueabi >> I wanted to install the latest version of the package, but a few >> binary depends are absent :) > squeeze gcc-4.3-$triplet_arch should be installable. > wheezy/sid gcc-4.[4-6]-arm-linux-gnueabi, should be installable, but > could as well be broken.

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-05-29 Thread Hector Oron
Hi Dmitry, 2011/5/27 Dmitry E. Oboukhov : > squeeze contains gcc-4.3-arm-inux-gnueabi > I wanted to install the latest version of the package, but a few > binary depends are absent :) squeeze gcc-4.3-$triplet_arch should be installable. wheezy/sid gcc-4.[4-6]-arm-linux-gnueabi, should be install

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-05-26 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
>> I can't install gcc for weeks: >> apache:[/home/dimka]# LANG=C apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.6-arm-linux-gnueabi >> Could anybody say if this is my mistake or this is a bug? > Emdebian is based on Debian 6.0 "Squeeze" as for now. > http://www.emdebian.org/emdebian/flavours.html squeeze contains

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-05-26 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
On 14:44 Fri 27 May , Alexey Kopytko wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: >> I can't install gcc for weeks: >> apache:[/home/dimka]# LANG=C apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.6-arm-linux-gnueabi >> Could anybody say if this is my mistake or this is a bug? > Emdebian i

Re: Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-05-26 Thread Alexey Kopytko
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > I can't install gcc for weeks: > apache:[/home/dimka]# LANG=C apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.6-arm-linux-gnueabi > Could anybody say if this is my mistake or this is a bug? Emdebian is based on Debian 6.0 "Squeeze" as for now. http://www.

Is emdebian repo broken?

2011-05-26 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
I can't install gcc for weeks: apache:[/home/dimka]# LANG=C apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.6-arm-linux-gnueabi Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This