Re: emacsen-common triggers rewrite

2024-07-23 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > Sounds reasonable -- any chance y'all are going to have someone who > might know handy at debconf? Oh, and if you do happen to chat with anyone dpkg-related, as an alternative, it might be handy if we had a tool (dpkg or other) that could properly sort a list of packages i

Re: emacsen-common triggers rewrite

2024-07-23 Thread Rob Browning
Sean Whitton writes: > Thanks. When David and I talked about it, we thought that we shouldn't > rely on ordering that's not guaranteed by the triggers spec -- though > possibly the spec has fallen out-of-date with the implementation. Sounds reasonable -- any chance y'all are going to have someo

Re: emacsen-common triggers rewrite

2024-07-23 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Tue 23 Jul 2024 at 08:18pm -05, Rob Browning wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >> We noticed that the triggers spec[0] says "It is not defined in what >> order triggers will run." We think this may invalidate your current >> approach. Or did you already see this and account for it? > >

Re: emacsen-common triggers rewrite

2024-07-23 Thread Rob Browning
Sean Whitton writes: > We noticed that the triggers spec[0] says "It is not defined in what > order triggers will run." We think this may invalidate your current > approach. Or did you already see this and account for it? I'll have to refresh, but from what I recall offhand, that might be a pr

emacsen-common triggers rewrite

2024-07-22 Thread Sean Whitton
[resending with correct list addr in CC] Hello Rob, David and I are looking at your design here at debcamp. We noticed that the triggers spec[0] says "It is not defined in what order triggers will run." We think this may invalidate your current approach. Or did you already see this and account