> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:50:14 +0100
> From: =?iso-8859-1?q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> emacs-devel@gnu.org,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 2005-12-09 20:33:11 +0100 Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2005-12-09 20:33:11 +0100 Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:12:03 +0100
>>> From: =?iso-8859-1?q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Cc: Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
>>> [E
From: Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you think emacs-snapshot will continue after 22.1 is released?
Of course. If things go
Adrian Robert has been working hard on the Emacs.app port for systems with
AppKit and FoundationKit:
http://emacs-app.sourceforge.net/
Does this work with GNUstep? If so, that increases our desire to
install it. But if it makes nontrivial changes in system-independent
files, we shoul
> Emacs, but it's still a package. Among unreleased code, the unicode-2
> branch of emacs is considered less stable than CVS head, I suppose, but
Nitpick: you probably meant "CVS trunk" since every branch has a HEAD.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
> > So your team will "release" emacs 23.x in 2005, while we didn't
> > even manage to release 22.x this year ...
>
> That is Emacs.app 9rc2, and it is based on what is in cvs/svn of
> emacs for the 23.x.
>
> > Don't know whether I should put :-) or :-( here...
>
> I would rather like u
On 2005-12-09 20:33:11 +0100 Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:12:03 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
On Dec 9, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Romain Francoise wrote:
[ Trimming the Cc list a bit. ]
Several people have asked for feature branches of CVS to be
included in
Debian: multi-tty, Xft, tiling, etc. There are several reasons why
this
isn't possible:
...
I see Emacs.app as one of these branches
Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you think emacs-snapshot will continue after 22.1 is released?
Of course. If things go according to plan, the Unicode, multi-tty and
Xft branches should be merged in the trunk in 2006. I look forward to
making them available in emacs-snapshot!
--
> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:12:03 +0100
> From: =?iso-8859-1?q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
>
> > Don't know whether I should put :-) or :-( here...
>
> I wo
[ Trimming the Cc list a bit. ]
Several people have asked for feature branches of CVS to be included in
Debian: multi-tty, Xft, tiling, etc. There are several reasons why this
isn't possible:
1. Including them in Debian as separate packages is a massive
duplication of resources and time s
On Dec 9, 2005, at 10:43 AM, Henrik Enberg wrote:
Don't know whether I should put :-) or :-( here...
I would rather like useful comments than shit like that.
Here's a useful comment. Are you going to release an experimental
branch that's not considered stable enough to be in the Emacs trun
On Dec 9, 2005, at 10:05 AM, Kim F. Storm wrote:
Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
For the curious and history:
1992 18.x http://www.linuks.mine.nu/openstep/emacs.png
2005 23.x http://gnu.ethz.ch/emacs.app.png
So your team will "release" emacs 23.x in 2005, while we didn't
even mana
On 2005-12-09 16:43:58 +0100 Henrik Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Don't know whether I should put :-) or :-( here...
I would rather like useful comments than shit like that.
Here's a useful comment. Are you going to release an experimental
branch that's not considered stable enough to
> > Don't know whether I should put :-) or :-( here...
>
> I would rather like useful comments than shit like that.
Here's a useful comment. Are you going to release an experimental
branch that's not considered stable enough to be in the Emacs trunk
as a stable program?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On 2005-12-09 16:05:02 +0100 Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> For the curious and history:
>> 1992 18.x http://www.linuks.mine.nu/openstep/emacs.png
>> 2005 23.x http://gnu.ethz.ch/emacs.app.png
>
> So your team will "release" emacs 23.x in
Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the curious and history:
> 1992 18.x http://www.linuks.mine.nu/openstep/emacs.png
> 2005 23.x http://gnu.ethz.ch/emacs.app.png
So your team will "release" emacs 23.x in 2005, while we didn't
even manage to release 22.x this year ...
Don't know whet
d cc me, I can answer..
>
> thanks,
> Adrian
>
>> ------ Forwarded message --
>> Date: 2005-11-30 00:11:59 +0100
>> From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: emacs.app_9.0pre2-1_i386.changes REJECTED
>>
>> Hi Maintainer,
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
