Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:10:53AM +0100, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> > MB> It sounds like these might be better considered bugs against the
> > MB> individual packages though, if they're doing unfriendly things
> > MB> without being asked to.
> >
> > N
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:10:53AM +0100, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> MB> It sounds like these might be better considered bugs against the
> MB> individual packages though, if they're doing unfriendly things
> MB> without being asked to.
>
> No, you did not understand the issue.
> 1. AUC TeX
>
> Anyway, a good start would be to just report bugs against emacs add-on
> packages that do something stupid (like those you mentioned). Fixing
> those problems will help, regardless of whether some additional
> mechanism is later added...
Doing so. Thanks.
(Had mailed all the package auth
D.Goel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > A typical emacs package has little effect unless you explicitly invoke it.
>
> While that is supposed to be true, it has been very untrue in
> practice, IME. Here are some examples of the top of my head:
>
> * Installing maxima makes my emacs N new fun
"D. Goel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While that is supposed to be true, it has been very untrue in
> practice, IME. Here are some examples of the top of my head:
>
> * Installing maxima makes my emacs N new functinos with ~ N namespaces
> * Installing ilisp makes emacs bind C-c which broke my
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh well, maybe I am trying to solve a problem which does not exist,
> and it is not such a good idea after all. I'd been thinking about it
> for a bit, and it did seem like a good one, though. I apologise for
> troubling the members of the list.
Well I pr
>
> A typical emacs package has little effect unless you explicitly invoke it.
While that is supposed to be true, it has been very untrue in
practice, IME. Here are some examples of the top of my head:
* Installing maxima makes my emacs N new functinos with ~ N namespaces,
and N is very large.
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:10:15 -0500, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 06:05:26PM +, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>> I think that for add-on lisp packages for emacs, there should be an
>> install-time option (debconf would be the obvious way to go here) to
>> enable the pac
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 06:05:26PM +, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> I think that for add-on lisp packages for emacs, there should be an
> install-time option (debconf would be the obvious way to go here) to
> enable the package globally, and if it is not enabled globally, there
> should be instructions
Dear People,
I don't know if I am out of line here, I'm not a Debian Developer or a
maintainer of an emacs-related package, just an appreciative user.
I think that for add-on lisp packages for emacs, there should be an
install-time option (debconf would be the obvious way to go here) to
enable th
10 matches
Mail list logo
