Re: XEmacs in a bad shape

2004-01-10 Thread Neil Roeth
On Jan 9, James LewisMoss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 22:02:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) > > said: > > jmarant> Hi, > > jmarant> FYI, xemacs21 has currently 6 RC bugs and most of them have > jmarant> not been worked on. The maintainer does

Re: XEmacs in a bad shape

2004-01-10 Thread Jérôme Marant
James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 22:02:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) >> said: > > jmarant> Hi, > > jmarant> FYI, xemacs21 has currently 6 RC bugs and most of them have > jmarant> not been worked on. The maintainer doesn't seem to be very

Re: XEmacs in a bad shape

2004-01-09 Thread James LewisMoss
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 22:02:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) > said: jmarant> Hi, jmarant> FYI, xemacs21 has currently 6 RC bugs and most of them have jmarant> not been worked on. The maintainer doesn't seem to be very jmarant> responsive. Anyone using XEmacs willing to h

Re: XEmacs in a bad shape

2004-01-07 Thread Jérôme Marant
Quoting Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Jan 5, Jérôme Marant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > FYI, xemacs21 has currently 6 RC bugs and most of them have not > > been worked on. The maintainer doesn't seem to be very responsive. > > Anyone using XEmacs willing to help? > > I submitted one

XEmacs in a bad shape

2004-01-05 Thread Neil Roeth
On Jan 5, Jérôme Marant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > FYI, xemacs21 has currently 6 RC bugs and most of them have not > been worked on. The maintainer doesn't seem to be very responsive. > Anyone using XEmacs willing to help? I submitted one of them (206667), and provided the patch for another

XEmacs in a bad shape

2004-01-05 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, FYI, xemacs21 has currently 6 RC bugs and most of them have not been worked on. The maintainer doesn't seem to be very responsive. Anyone using XEmacs willing to help? Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org