On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:27:36 -0800, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:33:49 -0800, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>>
>>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
serious is a severe violation of Debi
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:33:49 -0800, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> serious is a severe violation of Debian policy (that is, it
>>> violates a "must" or "required" directive), or, in the pa
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:33:49 -0800, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:41:45 -0800, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>>
>>> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Quoting Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [Experimental, in its current form, is basically a ghetto of sorts:
> > not only is it not auto-built, but people by and large don't use it
> > unless they have some special interest in a package which they already
> > _know_ is in experimental, and ther
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:33:49PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
>> All I'm trying to say is that if Emacs CVS snapshots are uploaded to
>> unstable, it should be done with the intention of releasing it in a
>> stable Debian release.
>
> Hmmm, I'm not sure wh
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I agree with you. This is why I expect experimental to be autobuilt
>> in order to easy the integration of such packages.
>
> And I think we should not create wrong, arbitary expectations
> of current practice (like, do not upload code not kno
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:33:49PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> All I'm trying to say is that if Emacs CVS snapshots are uploaded to
> unstable, it should be done with the intention of releasing it in a
> stable Debian release.
Hmmm, I'm not sure where I stand on your arguments, but I think your
c
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:41:45 -0800, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> JÃrÃme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Quoting Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
> BTW, Miles, I have prepared a package dedicated at Emacs CVS
> sna
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:43:05 +0100, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:37:34 -0600, Manoj Srivastava
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to debian-emacsen:
>> >This severity is *designed* to allow packages to live in
>> > unstable that sh
On 01 Mar 2004 12:37:28 +0200, debian said:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:37:34 -0600, Manoj Srivastava
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to debian-emacsen:
>> This severity is *designed* to allow packages to live in unstable
>> that should not yet go into testing.
> But the practice of uploading to uns
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:37:34 -0600, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> posted to debian-emacsen:
> >This severity is *designed* to allow packages to live in
> > unstable that should not yet go into testing.
>
> But the practice of uploading to unstable some
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:37:34 -0600, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted to debian-emacsen:
> This severity is *designed* to allow packages to live in
> unstable that should not yet go into testing.
But the practice of uploading to unstable something which cannot
reasonably be expec
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:41:45 -0800, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Quoting Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> > BTW, Miles, I have prepared a package dedicated at Emacs CVS
>>> > snapshots. What distribution do you think it would fit t
13 matches
Mail list logo
