I mean there wasn't even a emacs24 non snapshot package to fallback on.
RL> And to Julien Danjou who took over: Merci beaucoup aussi, but an i386
RL> version would be more than welcome :-)
Ah, http://julien.danjou.info/blog/2011.html#Emacs_snapshot_Debian_packages
How could I have (not) missed it
trentb...@gmail.com writes:
> jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
>> > "TWB" == Trent W Buck writes:
>> TWB> $ w3m -dump emacs.orebokech.com
>> TWB> As of January 2011, this site will no longer be updated.
>>
>> TWB> Can anyone tell me *why* that resource is deprecated? I can't find any
>> TWB> expl
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> > "TWB" == Trent W Buck writes:
> TWB> $ w3m -dump emacs.orebokech.com
> TWB> As of January 2011, this site will no longer be updated.
>
> TWB> Can anyone tell me *why* that resource is deprecated? I can't find any
> TWB> explanation on this list nor or emacs-dev
> "TWB" == Trent W Buck writes:
TWB> $ w3m -dump emacs.orebokech.com
TWB> As of January 2011, this site will no longer be updated.
TWB> Can anyone tell me *why* that resource is deprecated? I can't find any
TWB> explanation on this list nor or emacs-devel.
Unacceptable. They pulled the rug
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sure. But emacs23-snapshot suggests some compatibility with Emacs23.
> That is not the case. Nothing compiled for one snapshot is
> guaranteed to work with the next snapshot.
This would only be an issue if .elc files were preserved across
upgrades. This
Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> And could we please call it emacs23-snapshot?
>>
>> Why? It is a current packaging of the trunk. What feature set
>> constitutes "Emacs 23" is an evolving mat
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since you're talking in subjunctive here: are you aware of the
> snapshots available from http://emacs.orebokech.com/?
No, I wasn't aware of those. Probably because they are not in sid. :-)
>> I see two reasons for calling the packages emacs23-snapshot*
On 2008-08-14 11:14 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> Even if the feature set for Emacs 23 hasn't been set in stone (and I'd
> expect it to stay that way for a while), I think that a set of
> -snapshot packages that track development towards Emacs 23 would be
> useful for developers and Debian maintain
Brendan Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I have further problems is there a suitable forum for
> emacs-snapshot issues? It always helps to have public questions and
> answers.
I don't understand why this isn't a suitable forum...
Even if the emacs-snapshot packages aren't distributed by de
Brendan Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I have further problems is there a suitable forum for
> emacs-snapshot issues?
Unfortunately, no. Perhaps I should set up a Google Group or
something.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.deb
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why don't you use the etch backport instead? It should work on
> lenny too (but I haven't tried).
Thanks for the explanation. I'll try the backport.
If I have further problems is there a suitable forum for
emacs-snapshot issues? It always helps to
Hi,
I'm not sure if emacs-snapshot questions are relevant on
debian-emacsen, since the packages are not in Debian anymore. Feel
free to email me privately in case of problems.
Brendan Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have two machines running Lenny. One has happily upgraded
> emacs-snapsh
Petteri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any chance of getting XFT branch of emacs-snapshot. I have been
> compiling my own from emacs cvs and it seems quite stable (compared to a
> year a go when it segfaulted at least once a day).
FYI, I have been using the following Makefile to build .deb files fr
Romain Francoise kirjoitti su 25. helmikuuta 2007 14:07:12:
> Petteri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any chance of getting XFT branch of emacs-snapshot. I have been
> > compiling my own from emacs cvs and it seems quite stable
> > (compared to a year a go when it segfaulted at least once a day)
Petteri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any chance of getting XFT branch of emacs-snapshot. I have been
> compiling my own from emacs cvs and it seems quite stable
> (compared to a year a go when it segfaulted at least once a day).
Yes, it is quite stable now. I think it'll be merged in the trunk
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I installed emacs-snapshot, then should I purge gnus, as
> emacs-snapshot's gnus is newer than gnus package's gnus?
No, Gnus from the gnus package is newer.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.
Sven Joachim wrote (27 Dec 2005 13:07:24 GMT) :
> On Sat, 24 December, "intrigeri" wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I usually backport emacs-snapshot and a few related packages for my
>> own use. There are now in a Debian repository :
>> deb http://intrigeri.boum.org/deb sarge main contrib non-free
>
> Nice,
On Sat, 24 December, "intrigeri" wrote:
Hello,
I usually backport emacs-snapshot and a few related packages for my
own use. There are now in a Debian repository :
deb http://intrigeri.boum.org/deb sarge main contrib non-free
Nice, but there is an important issue: To comply with the GPL, you
whazzup!
Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> emacs20: /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/subdirs.el !!
Heh, looks like you rediscovered bug #62853. :-)
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
`-
--
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 02:12:19PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > However emacs-snapshot seems to load ispell and flyspell from
> > dictionaries-common rather than from its byte-compiled files
>
> Are you sure? It doesn't do that here...
>
> EL
Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However emacs-snapshot seems to load ispell and flyspell from
> dictionaries-common rather than from its byte-compiled files
Are you sure? It doesn't do that here...
ELISP> (locate-library "flyspell")
"/usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/textmodes/flyspell
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 12:52:00PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> and loads dict-common files because they are found first, despite they
> are not byte-compiled and the byte-compiled ones are available for
> emacs-snapshot.
>
> Any hint about the best way to deal with this?
Forgot to mention that
"Aaron S. Hawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about the other dozen topics under "Emacs snapshot"?
No easy way... it's a known problem of the Emacs info reader.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
`-
--
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Romain Francoise wrote:
> "Aaron S. Hawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm wondering if anybody knows of a quick way to get to a particular
> > [Emacs snapshot] manual from the keyboard.
>
> In emacs-snapshot, `C-h r'.
I had forgotten about that.
What about the other
"Aaron S. Hawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm wondering if anybody knows of a quick way to get to a particular
> manual from the keyboard.
In emacs-snapshot, `C-h r'.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
`-
[ Lundi 17 Octobre 2005 14:23 ]
| "Christophe Prud'homme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I had problems in the past with svn support in emacs-snapshot which
| > did allow me to really use emacs-snapshot (well I must admit that I
| > didn't really try to fix this).
|
| Not much has changed on that
"Christophe Prud'homme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had problems in the past with svn support in emacs-snapshot which
> did allow me to really use emacs-snapshot (well I must admit that I
> didn't really try to fix this).
Not much has changed on that front recently. It must have been caused
Quoting Christophe Prud'homme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi there,
>
> Just a few words about my experience with emacs-snapshot. Since
> emacs-snapshot
> has been in unstable, I have been testing once in a while. I had problems in
> the past with svn support in emacs-snapshot which did allow me to rea
Hi Sven,
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The packages emacs-snapshot-{el,common,bin-common} replace old
> versions of emacs21 (<< 21.2-4). Surely there is no need to do this,
> is it?
Certainly not.
> It seems to be a remnant of the later emacs21 packaging, which changed
> in versio
Romain Francoise wrote:
Henrik Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here you go, I hope you can decipher it...
For some reason, `directory-free-space-program' must be set to "df2" in
your setup... Could you try to find out why? It could be an init file
or a Debian package (since things o
Henrik Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here you go, I hope you can decipher it...
For some reason, `directory-free-space-program' must be set to "df2" in
your setup... Could you try to find out why? It could be an init file
or a Debian package (since things obviously work for everyone e
Romain Francoise wrote:
Henrik Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Searching for program: no such file or directory df2
What am I missing?
df2? ;-)
Retry after doing M-x toggle-debug-on-error RET and post the backtrace.
It's probably one of your site-lisp packages messing with Emacs
Henrik Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Searching for program: no such file or directory df2
> What am I missing?
df2? ;-)
Retry after doing M-x toggle-debug-on-error RET and post the backtrace.
It's probably one of your site-lisp packages messing with Emacs...
--
,''`.
: :' :
Em Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:27:30 +0200, Romain Francoise escreveu:
> You'd better keep emacs21 installed, the bug must be elsewhere...
Too late, gone already!
But I guess I'll have to reinstall, now when I try to get
ELisp packages, for example wget-el, apt tries to get xemacs21
inst
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's the interesting part, I didn't. So I guess I can just remove
> emacs21...
Oh, sorry, I misunderstood you. You'd better keep emacs21 installed,
the bug must be elsewhere...
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I just restarted emacs-snapshot-gtk after what seems to be
> font-related crash (not reproducible).
If you find a way to reproduce it, please file a bug.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancois
Em Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:39:38 +0200, Romain Francoise escreveu:
> You're using emacsclient from emacs21, use emacsclient.emacs-snapshot
> instead. To make emacs-snapshot's emacsclient the default, run
>
> update-alternatives --config emacsclient
Yes, that was it! Thanks a lot!
On 16. August 2005 at 8:00PM +0200,
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> It is a completely separate installation, and I recommend
> keeping the stable version installed alongside, in case the
> snapshot is too buggy to be usable (which should not happen,
> but you never know).
T
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> emacsclient: can't stat /tmp/esrv1000-corcete.exemplo.com: Success
You're using emacsclient from emacs21, use emacsclient.emacs-snapshot
instead. To make emacs-snapshot's emacsclient the default, run
update-alternatives --c
Em Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:55:51 -0400, Michael Alan Dorman escreveu:
> I'm considering uninstalling
> emacs21 just to save a little space and because it's not being used.
I thought the same, but for some reason since installing emacs-snapshot
I
can't send Pan buffers to it, as shown in .xse
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|> How would the "snapshot" package affect the "stable" version of
|> Emacs already installed by a user, particulary with regard to the
|> configuration files? The Description and Conflicts fields of the
|> various packages don't give any
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> How would the "snapshot" package affect the "stable" version of
> Emacs already installed by a user, particulary with regard to the
> configuration files? The Description and Conflicts fields of the
> various packages don't give any indication whether or not this
> pack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> How would the "snapshot" package affect the "stable" version of
> Emacs already installed by a user, particulary with regard to the
> configuration files? The Description and Conflicts fields of the
> various packages don't give any indication whether or not this
> packa
On 5. August 2005 at 11:28PM +0200,
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've spent some time today on initial emacs-snapshot packages
> and I'm happy to report that I've uploaded them a few hours
> ago. Thanks to Joerg Jaspert, they have already passed NEW
> approval[1] and should hit t
On 5 aoû 2005, Romain Francoise stated:
> I've spent some time today on initial emacs-snapshot packages
> and I'm happy to report that I've uploaded them a few hours
> ago. Thanks to Joerg Jaspert, they have already passed NEW
> approval[1] and should hit the mirrors after the next dinstall
> run
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see no Gtk2 yet?
As Daniel pointed out, you need to install `emacs-snapshot-gtk'.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Em Fri, 05 Aug 2005 23:28:43 +0200, Romain Francoise escreveu:
>
>> I've spent some time today on initial emacs-snapshot packages and I'm
>> happy to report that I've uploaded them a few hours ago.
>
> Thanks a lot!
Yes, th
Em Fri, 05 Aug 2005 23:28:43 +0200, Romain Francoise escreveu:
> I've spent some time today on initial emacs-snapshot packages and I'm
> happy to report that I've uploaded them a few hours ago.
Thanks a lot!
I see no Gtk2 yet?
--
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11)
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, I'm seeking for someone or a group of people willing to take it
> over.
I'd be glad to take it over! I can have an upload ready by the end of
the week, I think.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I think emacs-snapshot has reached the state of being able
>>> to enter debian.
>>
>> Wow, I'm really looking forward to that. Thanks for all the
>> work y
Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I think emacs-snapshot has reached the state of being able
>> to enter debian.
>
> Wow, I'm really looking forward to that. Thanks for all the
> work you've put into making this happen, Jérôme!
I did not
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think emacs-snapshot has reached the state of being able
> to enter debian.
Wow, I'm really looking forward to that. Thanks for all the
work you've put into making this happen, Jérôme!
--
Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So really, we all h
Sébastien Kirche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'll have a look soon. I also have many changes from the current stable
>> packaging. Also, emacs-snapshot is now managed through Arch (tla or
>> bazaar).
>
> I have noticed your arch repository, but i have no clue how to use it.
> Am supposed to pic
Le 15 mar 2005, Jérôme Marant a formulé :
> Thanks for the report! It's good to have reports ASAP since emacs-snapshot
> is meant to be a preparatory work for the next stable release.
No problem. Emacs-snapshot is a great work and it deserves that feedback.
> > Could someone tell me if I should
Sébastien Kirche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hello,
> I recently found that emacs-snapshot patch seems to be incompatible now with
> the Emacs CVS.
Thanks for the report! It's good to have reports ASAP since emacs-snapshot
is meant to be a preparatory work for the next stable release.
>
Sébastien Kirche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le 31 Jan 2005, Jérôme Marant vraute :
>
>> > I remember that we talked about that point months ago. Emacs-snapshot
>> > should not provide emacs21 to the apt package tree.
>>
>> What do you mean?
>
> That emacs-snapshot cannot replace emacs21 b
Le 31 Jan 2005, Jérôme Marant vraute :
> > I remember that we talked about that point months ago. Emacs-snapshot
> > should not provide emacs21 to the apt package tree.
>
> What do you mean?
That emacs-snapshot cannot replace emacs21 but installs aside, nor it can
provide emacs21 feature
Quoting Sébastien Kirche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le 31 Jan 2005, Jérôme Marant s'est exprimé ainsi :
>
> > Emacs-snapshot is not an emacs21 flavour.
>
> I remember that we talked about that point months ago. Emacs-snapshot should
> not provide emacs21 to the apt package tree.
What do you mean?
>
Le 31 Jan 2005, Jérôme Marant s'est exprimé ainsi :
> Emacs-snapshot is not an emacs21 flavour.
I remember that we talked about that point months ago. Emacs-snapshot should
not provide emacs21 to the apt package tree.
But did you talked with other Debian maintainers about the fact that
p
Quoting Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du lundi 31 janvier 2005, vers
> 15:57, Sébastien Kirche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> disait:
>
> > Mmmh... How did you compiled/installed emacs-snapshot ?
>
> > I used «fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage» to make the diff
OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du lundi 31 janvier 2005, vers
15:57, Sébastien Kirche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
disait:
> Mmmh... How did you compiled/installed emacs-snapshot ?
> I used «fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage» to make the different .deb then after
> installation of the packages em
Le 31 Jan 2005, Vincent Bernat a dit :
> Hello !
Hi !
> I have installed a CVS version of emacs using emacs-snapshot.tgz from
> Jérôme. I ran into some trouble when trying to use Gnus. I have
> compiled my own version from CVS and put it in ~/emacs/gnus. I changed
> in .gnus the load
Sebastien Kirche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Cool :)
> I hope that you would better see what problems i have. Anyway, ask if you
> want me to develop some point.
I'm sorry I'm having hardware problems and it needs to be repaired quickly.
I'll have a look at all those issues once my machine
Le 31 oct 2004, Jérôme Marant a formulé :
> > - on-line documentation is partially broken : sometimes it fails to
> > access /usr/share/emacs/21.3.50/etc/DOC-21.3.50.7 (looks very like Kai
> > had and following what was said on the list i did the make
> > maintainer-clean)
>
It seems that these days, running the emacs-snapshot package goes
quite smoothly.
I used to have the flavor troubles alluded to in the URL you cite, but
that has gone now. Now, packages seem to test for flavor != emacs
instead of flavor = emacs21. So packages get installed for
emacs-snapshot, to
Le 31 oct 2004, Jérôme Marant vraute :
> > I must tell that i have also the genuine emacs21 package installed to
> > allow installation of some other elisp packages (emacs_wiki, nxml, ...)
> > and it seems that emacs21 with emacs-snapshot together seem to have some
> > undesirable board effect
Sebastien Kirche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I use to follow the Emacs CVS development and i am also under Debian.
> Upon advice from Xavier Maillard some weeks ago, i installed the work from
> Jérôme Marant to build clean Debian Emacs packages.
OK.
> I had no difficulties for
68 matches
Mail list logo
