Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > > Why? As long as there are comaintainers to maintain those parts of
> > > the package, I see no reason for dropping them.
> >
> > I guess I wasn't clear enough. "leave alone" means "don't touch".
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Why? As long as there are comaintainers to maintain those parts of
> > the package, I see no reason for dropping them.
>
> I guess I wasn't clear enough. "leave alone" means "don't touch".
> They won't change.
>
> However, I am considering orp
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > [I sent this earlier but never saw it appear...]
> > Hi,
>
> ...
>
> > I want to restructure these packages. I intend to leave `devscripts-el'
> > and `gnus-bonus-el' alone, giving control over devs
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [I sent this earlier but never saw it appear...]
> Hi,
...
> I want to restructure these packages. I intend to leave `devscripts-el'
> and `gnus-bonus-el' alone, giving control over devscripts-el' to its
> upstream author Junichi Uekawa and find
4 matches
Mail list logo
