Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am afraid it is too late now. dpkg-dev-el is already in unstable.
It's fine. As I said, it wasn't a big deal to me either way.
Thanks for the work.
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:17:05AM -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
> Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > dpkg-dev-emacsen and dpkg-dev-el have been suggested too, I guess so
> > that Xemacs/EINE/ZWEI or other Emacs variants users are not
> > jealous. I have no strong opinion for or against
Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dpkg-dev-emacsen and dpkg-dev-el have been suggested too, I guess so
> that Xemacs/EINE/ZWEI or other Emacs variants users are not
> jealous. I have no strong opinion for or against any one of these
> names.
I have a slight preference for dpkg-dev-emacs
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:26:17AM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> My sponsor and I are only waiting for some consensus to be reached
> before he uploads the package. Consider this to be a RFC / CFD / CFV
> / whatever. If noone reacts, I guess we'll consider that the
> consensus has been reached o
4 matches
Mail list logo
