Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-10-01 Thread Nicolas Duboc
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:57:26PM -0400, Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle wrote: > Nicolas Duboc wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:49:18PM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm maintaining zile, a small Emacs clone in terminal mode. It provides > >>emacs key bindings, buffers and even

Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-10-01 Thread Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle
Nicolas Duboc wrote: On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:49:18PM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote: Hi, I'm maintaining zile, a small Emacs clone in terminal mode. It provides emacs key bindings, buffers and even a lisp config file. But of course it is lighter and do not aim at being a complete replacem

Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-09-29 Thread Nicolas Duboc
Romain Francoise wrote : > No offense, but I don't think anyone cares very much as long as zile > doesn't get in the way of a real Emacs alternative. So just do whatever > you feel is right. OK, so I will register zile as an alternative for emacs. I will use priority 12 so as to be higher than

Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-09-27 Thread Romain Francoise
Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No more feedback about that ? > Should bring this question on debian-devel to have a statement ? No offense, but I don't think anyone cares very much as long as zile doesn't get in the way of a real Emacs alternative. So just do whatever you feel is ri

Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-09-27 Thread Helmut Franke
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:58:44PM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:49:18PM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote: > >Hi, > > > > I'm maintaining zile, a small Emacs clone in terminal mode. It provides > > emacs key bindings, buffers and even a lisp config file. But of course > >

Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-09-27 Thread Nicolas Duboc
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:49:18PM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote: >Hi, > > I'm maintaining zile, a small Emacs clone in terminal mode. It provides > emacs key bindings, buffers and even a lisp config file. But of course > it is lighter and do not aim at being a complete replacement for emacs. >

Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-09-15 Thread Nicolas Duboc
Florent Rougon wrote: > I haven't tried zile, but I fail to see the point of such a request. If > zile is significantly different from Emacs (and I guess it is, from what > you wrote), I'd say there's no point in making users believe it is > Emacs, by virtue of the alternative trick. That would be

Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-09-14 Thread Florent Rougon
Hi, Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of Zile users asked me to register zile as an alternative to emacs > (#387164). I haven't tried zile, but I fail to see the point of such a request. If zile is significantly different from Emacs (and I guess it is, from what you wrote), I'd say