Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-21 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Daniel Schepler | Then I'm genuinely curious what's different about the situation with | phpgroupware and usermin/webmin. xemacs is mostly self-contained, the webmin packages depends on the programs they configure. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''

Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-02 Thread James LewisMoss
> On Thu, 01 May 2003 20:51:48 -0700, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Daniel> Honestly, though, I'm getting less and less convinced myself Daniel> that this is a good idea. This is basically the reason I haven't done this. It seemed like a lot of work for basically no gain

Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-02 Thread Kai Großjohann
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I've made a first rough version of a splitting of >> xemacs21-{base,mule}support into individual packages. These packages >> are at > > Err, is this some sort of May 1st joke? Please tell me this isn't > i

Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-01 Thread Daniel Schepler
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Browsing through the wishlist bugs on xemacs21-packages, I've seen >> several requests for the ability to remove parts of the XEmacs >> support code, either to save disk space or to replace them with >> newe

Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-01 Thread James Troup
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Browsing through the wishlist bugs on xemacs21-packages, I've seen > several requests for the ability to remove parts of the XEmacs > support code, either to save disk space or to replace them with > newer upstream versions. I really don't buy the sav

Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-01 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've made a first rough version of a splitting of > xemacs21-{base,mule}support into individual packages. These packages > are at > > deb http://people.debian.org/~schepler/ xemacs21/ > > along with updated versions of a few packages which previous

Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-01 Thread Daniel Schepler
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I've made a first rough version of a splitting of >> xemacs21-{base,mule}support into individual packages. These packages >> are at > > Err, is this some sort of May 1st joke? Please tell me this isn't > i

Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-01 Thread James Troup
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've made a first rough version of a splitting of > xemacs21-{base,mule}support into individual packages. These packages > are at Err, is this some sort of May 1st joke? Please tell me this isn't intended for upload into the archive proper. 73 new