On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:37:59 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Now you have to ask yourself: for how many Emacs packages are there
> Debian versions maintained by upstream, the ideal constellation?
If by that you mean that there is ./debian directory upstream,
then by no
* Holger Schauer (2005-06-01) writes:
> On 4290 September 1993, Ralf Angeli wrote:
>
>> I don't consider it uncommon that people have software installed
>> manually which is also available via the package system. Reasons
>> could be special build options or the need for other versions of the
>> s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On 4282 September 1993, J. wrote:
>> I think this requires some changes in the policy:
>> Common .el files could be installed in /usr{,/local}/share/emacsen/site-lisp
>> which is not a standard location in Emacsen's path.
>> It would replace /usr/{,/local}/share/emacs/s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On 4290 September 1993, Ralf Angeli wrote:
>> * Holger Schauer (2005-05-31) writes:
>
>>> I wear glasses, but I'm not blind. Referring on a Debian list to a manual
>>> installation of a package that Debian distributes as a Debian package is
>>> a red herring.
>
>> I don
On 4282 September 1993, J. wrote:
> I think this requires some changes in the policy:
> Common .el files could be installed in /usr{,/local}/share/emacsen/site-lisp
> which is not a standard location in Emacsen's path.
> It would replace /usr/{,/local}/share/emacs/site-lisp in both Emacsen
> paths
On 4290 September 1993, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> * Holger Schauer (2005-05-31) writes:
>> I wear glasses, but I'm not blind. Referring on a Debian list to a manual
>> installation of a package that Debian distributes as a Debian package is
>> a red herring.
> I don't consider it uncommon that people
Selon OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually, I have a local Subversion repository in my box.
OK.
> I want to use alioth repository to co-maintain xemacs21. We
> have already alioth project of Debian XEmacs Package:
>
> https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-xemacs/
>
> but, I'm not a
* Holger Schauer (2005-05-31) writes:
> I wear glasses, but I'm not blind. Referring on a Debian list to a manual
> installation of a package that Debian distributes as a Debian package is
> a red herring.
I don't consider it uncommon that people have software installed
manually which is also ava
Ralf Angeli wrote:
> * Holger Schauer (2005-05-30) writes:
> If /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp were a directory to be used by
> XEmacs then why isn't it included in XEmacs' paths.h or found by
> (paths-find-site-lisp-directory '("/usr/local"))
> in case XEmacs is configured with a bare ./configur
* Holger Schauer (2005-05-30) writes:
> On 4281 September 1993, Ralf Angeli wrote:
>> following up on a discussion from the xemacs-beta mailing list I'd
>> like to point out some issues with the XEmacs package Debian is
>> providing and suggest possible remedies.
>
> First of all, I should mentio
Moin Ralf, dear list,
On 4281 September 1993, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> following up on a discussion from the xemacs-beta mailing list I'd
> like to point out some issues with the XEmacs package Debian is
> providing and suggest possible remedies.
First of all, I should mention that I'm unaware of an
Hi.
From: Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Some XEmacs issues and proposals
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:25:57 +0200
> I think you could start by making the packaging available through
> a version control system.
> For Emacs, we use bazaar
> (people.debian.org/~
* OHURA Makoto (2005-05-24) writes:
>> Anyway, XEmacs still picks up at least one wrong file. So taking
>> aside /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp because it is under the package
>> system's control, I think at least /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
>> should not be added to XEmacs' load-path in order t
Quoting OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi.
>
> I think I should call for co-maintainer of xemacs21 and
> xemacs21-packages. I'm using xemacs21 everyday and I'm
> interested in maintaining these two packages even now, but there
> are some problems. For example, I don't have enough time t
Hi.
I think I should call for co-maintainer of xemacs21 and
xemacs21-packages. I'm using xemacs21 everyday and I'm
interested in maintaining these two packages even now, but there
are some problems. For example, I don't have enough time to
research all the bugs related to xemacs21. And espe
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everybody,
Hi,
> following up on a discussion from the xemacs-beta mailing list I'd
> like to point out some issues with the XEmacs package Debian is
> providing and suggest possible remedies. The problems are affecting
> AUCTeX to some extent, so I
16 matches
Mail list logo
