Re: Packages marked as testing auto-removel due to bug#999962

2023-09-06 Thread Manphiz
Manphiz writes: > Nicholas D Steeves writes: > >> Manphiz writes: >> >> [..snip..] >> >>> It seems that the maintainer has been MIA. Do you suggest proposing an >>> NMU? >> >> Until a package has been orphaned by the MIA team, the question is NMU >> vs salvaging: >> >> https://wiki.debian.or

Re: Packages marked as testing auto-removel due to bug#999962

2023-09-06 Thread Manphiz
Nicholas D Steeves writes: > Manphiz writes: > > [..snip..] > >> It seems that the maintainer has been MIA. Do you suggest proposing an >> NMU? > > Until a package has been orphaned by the MIA team, the question is NMU > vs salvaging: > > https://wiki.debian.org/PackageSalvaging > > https:

Re: Packages marked as testing auto-removel due to bug#999962

2023-09-05 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Manphiz writes: > Nicholas D Steeves writes: > >> Manphiz writes: >> >> To be fair, the following issue wasn't introduced by this MR, but was [snip] >> dh_elpa_test: error: emacs -batch -Q -l package --eval "(add-to-list >> 'package-directory-list \"/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa\")" --eval

Re: Packages marked as testing auto-removel due to bug#999962

2023-09-04 Thread Manphiz
Nicholas D Steeves writes: > Manphiz writes: > >>> >>> I'm not a silversearch-ag user, but your suggestion makes sense to me. >>> >>> d >> >> Thanks David! I've prepared a merge request[1] on emacs-wgrep to >> implement this idea. Would be great to have your reviews and comments. >> If this is

Re: Packages marked as testing auto-removel due to bug#999962

2023-09-04 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Manphiz writes: >> >> I'm not a silversearch-ag user, but your suggestion makes sense to me. >> >> d > > Thanks David! I've prepared a merge request[1] on emacs-wgrep to > implement this idea. Would be great to have your reviews and comments. > If this is an acceptable direction to go forward I

Re: Packages marked as testing auto-removel due to bug#999962

2023-07-21 Thread Manphiz
David Bremner writes: > Manphiz writes: > >> Dear Emacsen Maintainers, >> >> It looks like a few Emacsen packages are marked as testing auto-removal >> due to bug#62[1]. It looks like this pcre to pcre2 migration is >> non-trivial, and the upstream of silversearcher-ag[2] seems to be silent

Re: Packages marked as testing auto-removel due to bug#999962

2023-07-20 Thread David Bremner
Manphiz writes: > Dear Emacsen Maintainers, > > It looks like a few Emacsen packages are marked as testing auto-removal > due to bug#62[1]. It looks like this pcre to pcre2 migration is > non-trivial, and the upstream of silversearcher-ag[2] seems to be silent > since Dec. 2020. The list of