[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > (I might add one for MH-E, now that the subject has come up.)
>
> I like to try out mh-e.
Good! :-)
> But there's a conflict between it and
> wl, which I'm already using as my primary MUA. Is there any
> possibili
On November 20, 2003 at 3:38AM +0900,
Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On November 20, 2003 at 12:35AM +0800,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Is the separated date and time a mew feature?
>
> No. The my-simplify-822date function (defined in my ~/.emacs)
> provides that feature.
On November 20, 2003 at 12:35AM +0800,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is the separated date and time a mew feature?
No. The my-simplify-822date function (defined in my ~/.emacs)
provides that feature.
(my-simplify-822date "Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:14:24 +0900 (JST)" 'at-time)
"November 20, 2003 at
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:48:04 +0900,
OHASHI Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is there a better way to customize the wanderlust reply
> > header than hacking the .el file?
> We are using mu-cite[1] with wl (and the other MUAs) for
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:29:25 -0500,
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> > Is there a better way to customize the wanderlust reply
> > header than hacking the .el file?
>
> Ask upstream to create a defcustom for it?
>
> (I might add one for MH-E, now that the subject h
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a better way to customize the wanderlust reply header
> than hacking the .el file?
We are using mu-cite[1] with wl(and the other MUAs) for customizing
citation. In your case, install mu-cite and add the following line
to .e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I invoke (meta-X) wl-summary-reply-with-citation, I get the
> following reply header:
>
> At Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:57:52 +0900,
> somebody wrote:
>
> I think this reads better as:
>
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 at 10:57:52 +0900,
>
> or perhaps even a more verbose:
7 matches
Mail list logo
