Re: Building a package that uses goto-addr.el

2001-10-10 Thread Colin Walters
jeSPer Holm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The right thing to to would be to make my package depend on > xemacs21-basesupport? I would just make your package Depend: on xemacs21. And be sure your emacsen-install script only compiles for xemacs21, if that's all it runs on.

Re: Building a package that uses goto-addr.el

2001-10-10 Thread Peter S Galbraith
jeSPer Holm wrote: > (Eicq is, for now, a > XEmacs only package) packages and then mule2-support. > > The right thing to to would be to make my package depend on > xemacs21-basesupport? I guess so. I presume your elisp can simply (require 'goto-addr

Re: Building a package that uses goto-addr.el

2001-10-10 Thread jeSPer Holm
Hi On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:24:17 -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > jeSPer Holm wrote: >> I'm building a package (eicq) that uses goto-addr.el. I have found >> out that goto-addr.el is included in mule2-support - and now for my >> questions: >> >> 1. Should I make my new package depend on mule

Re: Building a package that uses goto-addr.el

2001-10-10 Thread Peter S Galbraith
jeSPer Holm wrote: >Hi > > I'm building a package (eicq) that uses goto-addr.el. I have found out > that goto-addr.el is included in mule2-support - and now for my > questions: > > 1. Should I make my new package depend on mule2-support? Huh? It might be in mule-support, but it seems to