Re: Heads-up: emacs-snapshot now comes in several subflavors

2006-03-05 Thread Romain Francoise
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it would be a good idea to give the subflavors different > priorities, in the order emacs-snapshot-gtk > emacs-snapshot-x > > emacs-snapshot-nox, as I guess this order would be preferred by most > people. > What do other people think? No reactio

Re: Heads-up: emacs-snapshot now comes in several subflavors

2006-01-30 Thread Sven Joachim
Romain Francoise wrote: Starting with version 20060120-2, it is now possible to install the -x, -gtk and -nox binary packages concurrently. The new alternative `emacs-snapshot' determines which package owns the emacs-snapshot command. There is currently no preference which binary owns the emac

Heads-up: emacs-snapshot now comes in several subflavors

2006-01-28 Thread Romain Francoise
Starting with version 20060120-2, it is now possible to install the -x, -gtk and -nox binary packages concurrently. The new alternative `emacs-snapshot' determines which package owns the emacs-snapshot command. Note that if you're upgrading from the current emacs-snapshot packages, you should *pu